Is it worth to insert uterine pack instead of Bakri balloon to control postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery in hypertensive patients?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and effectiveness of uterine packing with gauze compared to Bakri balloon to control postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal delivery in patients with hypertensive disorders with pregnancy (HDP).

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study conducted on 142 patients with HDP who suffered atonic PPH following vaginal delivery and were allocated either to insert uterine packing with gauze (n = 68) or insertion of Bakri balloon (n = 74). Success of the tamponade to arrest bleeding was the primary outcome measure. Data was collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Most of the included patients experienced spontaneous onset of labour (69%), had not receive I.V. antihypertensive drugs (83.1%) or magnesium sulphate (94.4%), or calcium channel blocker (95.7%), underwent spontaneous vaginal delivery (85.9%), received Pethidine by IMI for pain relief during labour (67.6%), did not need an episiotomy (59.2%), with spontaneous delivery of the placenta (95.77%). Bakri balloon was associated with a shorter duration to insert (p < 0.001), a higher failure rate with the need for laparotomy (p < 0.05) and more post-delivery hospital stay compared to uterine packing (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although uterine packing with gauze to control PPH after vaginal delivery in patients with HDP requires a longer time to insert compared to Bakri balloon yet associated with a lesser need for laparotomy and shorter hospital stay. Larger trials are warranted to confirm or refute these findings.