School of Built Environment, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6DF, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 9;17(3):1099. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031099.
Exposure to PM has been associated with increased mortality in urban areas. Hence, reducing the uncertainty in human exposure assessments is essential for more accurate health burden estimates. Here, we quantified the misclassification that occurred when using different exposure approaches to predict the mortality burden of a population using London as a case study. We developed a framework for quantifying the misclassification of the total mortality burden attributable to exposure to fine particulate matter (PM) in four major microenvironments (MEs) (dwellings, aboveground transportation, London Underground (LU) and outdoors) in the Greater London Area (GLA), in 2017. We demonstrated that differences exist between five different exposure Tier-models with incrementally increasing complexity, moving from static to more dynamic approaches. BenMap-CE, the open source software developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, was used as a tool to achieve spatial distribution of the ambient concentration by interpolating the monitoring data to the unmonitored areas and ultimately estimating the change in mortality on a fine resolution. Indoor exposure to PM is the largest contributor to total population exposure concentration, accounting for 83% of total predicted population exposure, followed by the London Underground, which contributes approximately 15%, despite the average time spent there by Londoners being only 0.4%. After incorporating housing stock and time-activity data, moving from static to most dynamic metric, Inner London showed the highest reduction in exposure concentration (i.e., approximately 37%) and as a result the largest change in mortality (i.e., health burden/mortality misclassification) was observed in central GLA. Overall, our findings showed that using outdoor concentration as a surrogate for total population exposure but ignoring different exposure concentration that occur indoors and time spent in transit, led to a misclassification of 1174-1541 mean predicted mortalities in GLA. We generally confirm that increasing the complexity and incorporating important microenvironments, such as the highly polluted LU, could significantly reduce the misclassification of health burden assessments.
PM 的暴露与城市地区死亡率的增加有关。因此,减少人体暴露评估中的不确定性对于更准确地估计健康负担至关重要。在这里,我们以伦敦为例,量化了使用不同暴露方法来预测人口死亡率负担时可能出现的分类错误。我们开发了一个框架,用于量化在大伦敦地区(GLA)四个主要微观环境(ME)(住宅、地面交通、伦敦地铁(LU)和户外)中,归因于细颗粒物(PM)暴露的总死亡率负担的分类错误,时间为 2017 年。我们表明,在五个不同的暴露层级模型之间存在差异,这些模型的复杂性逐渐增加,从静态方法转变为更动态的方法。美国环境保护署开发的开源软件 BenMap-CE 被用作工具,通过将监测数据内插到未监测区域来实现环境浓度的空间分布,并最终在精细分辨率下估计死亡率的变化。室内 PM 暴露是总人群暴露浓度的最大贡献者,占总预测人群暴露的 83%,其次是伦敦地铁,贡献约 15%,尽管伦敦人在那里的平均停留时间仅为 0.4%。在纳入住房存量和时间活动数据后,从静态到最动态指标转变,内伦敦显示出暴露浓度的最大降低(即约 37%),因此在 GLA 中心观察到最大的死亡率变化(即健康负担/死亡率分类错误)。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,使用室外浓度作为总人群暴露的替代物,但忽略了室内和交通时间的不同暴露浓度,会导致 GLA 中 1174-1541 例平均预测死亡人数的分类错误。我们普遍证实,增加复杂性并纳入重要的微观环境,如高度污染的 LU,可以显著减少健康负担评估的分类错误。