• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一个医生拥有的 Bundled Payments for Care Improvement(BPCI)项目中,将全膝关节置换术从仅住院治疗清单中移除所产生的财务影响。

Financial impact of removal of total knee arthroplasty from the inpatient-only list for a physician-owned BPCI program.

作者信息

Rizkalla James M, Bhimani Aamir A, Kitziger Kurt J, Peters Paul C, Schubert Richard D, Gladnick Brian P

机构信息

Baylor Univeristy Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 3500 Gaston Ave, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.

W.B. Carrell Memorial Clinic, Adult Hip and Knee Reconstruction, 9301 N. Central Expressway, Suite 500, Dallas, TX, 75231, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2020 Jan 30;20:221-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.045. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.045
PMID:32051673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7005332/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assessing financial effects of removal of TKA from CMS inpatient-only list on physician-owned bundles.

METHODS

We determined whether Medicare TKAs remained inpatient, versus changed to observational. We used CMS data to determine savings. Direct costs associated with BPCI were calculated.

RESULTS

7/28 TKAs (25.0%) had inpatient status changed to observational, excluding them from BPCI. Estimated savings losses were $24,332. Direct costs for administrating BPCI were $51,250. Had the rate of patients changed to observational been 50%, bundle savings from remaining patients would be less than direct costs.

CONCLUSION

Removing TKA from CMS inpatient-only list may have negative financial implications.

摘要

目的

评估将全膝关节置换术(TKA)从医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)仅住院治疗列表中移除对医生拥有的捆绑支付模式的财务影响。

方法

我们确定医疗保险的全膝关节置换术是仍为住院治疗,还是改为观察性治疗。我们使用CMS的数据来确定节省的费用。计算了与基于 episode 的综合付费(BPCI)相关的直接成本。

结果

28例全膝关节置换术中的7例(25.0%)住院状态改为观察性治疗,从而被排除在基于 episode 的综合付费之外。估计节省费用损失为24,332美元。管理基于 episode 的综合付费的直接成本为51,250美元。如果改为观察性治疗的患者比例为50%,则剩余患者的捆绑支付节省费用将低于直接成本。

结论

将全膝关节置换术从CMS仅住院治疗列表中移除可能会产生负面的财务影响。

相似文献

1
Financial impact of removal of total knee arthroplasty from the inpatient-only list for a physician-owned BPCI program.在一个医生拥有的 Bundled Payments for Care Improvement(BPCI)项目中,将全膝关节置换术从仅住院治疗清单中移除所产生的财务影响。
J Orthop. 2020 Jan 30;20:221-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.045. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
2
2020 John N. Insall Award: Removal of total knee arthroplasty from the inpatient-only list adversely affects bundled payment programmes.2020 年约翰·N·英萨尔奖:将全膝关节置换术从仅限住院治疗的清单中移除会对打包支付计划产生不利影响。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun;102-B(6_Supple_A):19-23. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1369.
3
Unintended Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Consequences After Removal of Total Knee Arthroplasty From Inpatient-Only List.非预期捆绑支付对全膝关节置换术从仅限住院转为常规治疗后的改善效果的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S121-S124. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.053. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
4
Are Bundled Payments a Viable Reimbursement Model for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?捆绑支付是否是翻修全关节置换术可行的报销模式?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2714-2721. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4953-6. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
2018 John Charnley Award: Analysis of US Hip Replacement Bundled Payments: Physician-initiated Episodes Outperform Hospital-initiated Episodes.2018 年约翰·查恩利奖:美国髋关节置换捆绑支付分析:医生发起的病例优于医院发起的病例。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):271-280. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000532.
6
Bundled Payments Are Effective in Reducing Costs Following Bilateral Total Joint Arthroplasty.双侧全关节置换术后捆绑式支付可有效降低成本。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1317-1321.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.041. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
7
The Financial Implications of the Removal of Total Knee Arthroplasty From the Medicare Inpatient-Only List.移除全膝关节置换术纳入医疗保险仅限住院治疗目录的财务影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S33-S36. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.074. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
8
Reconsidering the Affordable Care Act's Restrictions on Physician-Owned Hospitals: Analysis of CMS Data on Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.重新审视《平价医疗法案》对医师拥有医院的限制:对医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心全髋关节和膝关节置换术数据的分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Nov 15;99(22):1888-1894. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00203.
9
Cost of Joint Replacement Using Bundled Payment Models.采用打包付费模式的关节置换成本。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):214-222. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8263.
10
Medicare bundles for arthroplasty : a journey back to fee for service?医疗保险捆绑式支付在关节置换术中的应用:是否会回归按服务项目收费模式?
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun;103-B(6 Supple A):119-125. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-2315.R1.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Readmission and Revision After Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Cause and Cost.全关节置换术后的早期再入院和翻修:原因与成本分析
HSS J. 2024 May;20(2):187-194. doi: 10.1177/15563316241230052. Epub 2024 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Bundled Payments for Care Improvement: Health System Experience With Lower Extremity Joint Replacement at Higher and Lower Volume Hospitals.捆绑支付改善护理:高低容量医院下肢关节置换的卫生系统经验。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2284-2289. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 13.
2
Predicting Inpatient Status After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare-Aged Patients.预测 Medicare 年龄段患者初次全膝关节置换术后的住院状态。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1322-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
3
Unintended Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Consequences After Removal of Total Knee Arthroplasty From Inpatient-Only List.非预期捆绑支付对全膝关节置换术从仅限住院转为常规治疗后的改善效果的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S121-S124. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.053. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
4
Total Hip Arthroplasty and the Medicare Inpatient-Only List: An Analysis of Complications in Medicare-Aged Patients Undergoing Outpatient Surgery.全髋关节置换术和医疗保险仅限住院患者清单:对接受门诊手术的 Medicare 年龄段患者并发症的分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1250-1254. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.031. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
5
The Unintended Impact of the Removal of Total Knee Arthroplasty From the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Inpatient-Only List.移除全膝关节置换术(Total Knee Arthroplasty)从医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)仅限住院患者清单的意外影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3602-3606. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.043. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
6
Should Medicare Remove Total Knee Arthroplasty From Its Inpatient Only List? A Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not a Partial Knee Arthroplasty.医疗保险是否应将全膝关节置换术从仅限住院治疗清单中移除?全膝关节置换术不是部分膝关节置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S23-S27. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.028. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
7
Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty.门诊全关节置换术
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):567-574. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9451-2.
8
Bundled Payments for Care Improvement: Boom or Bust?医疗改善捆绑支付:繁荣还是失败?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):2931-2934. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 15.
9
Effect of Bundled Payments and Health Care Reform as Alternative Payment Models in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Clinical Review.捆绑支付和医疗保健改革作为全关节置换术替代支付模式的效果:一项临床综述
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2590-2597. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.027. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
10
BPCI: Everyone Wins, Including the Patient.医保支付与医疗服务改进项目:人人皆赢,包括患者。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1728-1731. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Feb 28.