Suppr超能文献

灭菌肿瘤骨再植重建术在骨干骨肉瘤中能带来生存获益吗?

Does Reconstruction with Reimplantation of Sterilized Tumor Bone Provide Survival Benefit in Diaphyseal Osteosarcoma?

作者信息

Nayak Prakash, Gulia Ashish, Puri Ajay

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Disease Management Group, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.

出版信息

Sarcoma. 2020 Jan 19;2020:4092790. doi: 10.1155/2020/4092790. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Does reimplantation of sterilized tumor bone for reconstruction provide outcome benefits in intercalary osteosarcoma based on the potential immunogenic effect of reimplanted sterilized tumor tissue? Of 720 cases of surgically treated high-grade osteosarcoma patients treated at our institute from 2006 to 2013, 61 had predominantly diaphyseal disease. All patients were nonmetastatic at presentation. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment details, and local recurrence-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival were compared for 24 patients who had reconstruction with sterilized tumor bone reimplantation vs 37 who did not. Both the groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics. Means were compared with the -test, proportions with the chi-square test, and survival with the log-rank test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to construct time to event curves. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was employed for multivariate time to event analysis. Twenty-two had extracorporeal radiation and reimplantation (ECRT) with or without the vascularised fibula. Fifty-gray single dose was used in all cases. Two had pasteurization and reimplantation. Thirty seven had non-reimplantation reconstructions (including intercalary or osteoarticular endoprosthesis, pedicled bone grafts, rotation-plasty, and amputations). Five-year local recurrence-free survival was 85% for reimplantation and 97% for non-reimplantation groups (=0.17). Five-year metastasis-free survival was 63% and 54%, respectively (=0.44). Five-year overall survival was 70% and 58%, respectively (=0.39). The data from this study did not demonstrate significantly better local recurrence-free, distant relapse-free, or overall survival benefit in the tumor bone reimplantation group.

摘要

基于再植入的无菌肿瘤组织的潜在免疫原性效应,无菌肿瘤骨再植入用于重建在节段性骨肉瘤中是否能带来预后益处?在2006年至2013年于我院接受手术治疗的720例高级别骨肉瘤患者中,61例主要为骨干疾病。所有患者初诊时均无转移。比较了24例行无菌肿瘤骨再植入重建的患者与37例未行该治疗的患者的患者及肿瘤特征、治疗细节以及局部无复发生存率、无转移生存率和总生存率。两组在基线特征方面匹配良好。均值采用t检验进行比较,比例采用卡方检验,生存率采用对数秩检验。采用Kaplan-Meier方法构建事件发生时间曲线。采用Cox比例风险回归模型进行多变量事件发生时间分析。22例患者接受了体外放疗和再植入(ECRT),伴或不伴带血管腓骨。所有病例均采用50格雷单剂量。2例采用巴氏消毒法和再植入。37例患者进行了非再植入重建(包括节段性或骨关节假体、带蒂骨移植、旋转成形术和截肢)。再植入组的5年局部无复发生存率为85%,非再植入组为97%(P = 0.17)。5年无转移生存率分别为63%和54%(P = 0.44)。5年总生存率分别为70%和58%(P = 0.39)。本研究数据未显示肿瘤骨再植入组在局部无复发生存率、远处无复发率或总生存获益方面有显著更好的表现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa44/6995309/c5c79cd93af0/SARCOMA2020-4092790.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验