Gizani Sotiria, Kloukos Dimitrios, Papadimitriou Aikaterini, Roumani Theoni, Twetman Svante
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Feb 14;18(1):2-10. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a44113.
White spot lesions (WSL) are common side-effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed multi-bracketed appliances. The aim of this review was to find all available literature and critically assess the evidence for the efficacy of bleaching as a method to treat or alleviate post-orthodontic WSLs in permanent teeth.
Electronic databases were screened for relevant literature with the aid of predetermined search strategies. All types of studies, including randomised or nonrandomised controlled trials (RCTs or CCTs), prospective and retrospective studies, as well as in vitro studies were considered eligible for inclusion. The reference lists of all included articles were hand searched for additional studies. Two authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment.
One RCT and 8 in vitro studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies were classified as having a high risk of bias while 2 in vitro studies were graded as having a moderate risk of bias. The results showed that bleaching of WSL can diminish colour disparities between carious and non-affected areas, but the certainty of the evidence was very low. The high degree of methodological heterogeneity precluded a valid interpretation of the results through pooled estimates.
The findings from the present systematic review could not support or refute bleaching as an effective method for management of post-orthodontic WSLs. Because most of the studies in this field are in vitro and solid scientific evidence of low risk of bias is scare, further prospective in vivo studies are necessary.
白斑病变(WSL)是固定多托槽矫治器正畸治疗常见的副作用。本综述的目的是查找所有可用文献,并严格评估漂白作为治疗或减轻恒牙正畸后WSL疗效的证据。
借助预先确定的检索策略,对电子数据库进行相关文献筛选。所有类型的研究,包括随机或非随机对照试验(RCT或CCT)、前瞻性和回顾性研究以及体外研究均被视为符合纳入标准。对所有纳入文章的参考文献列表进行人工检索以查找其他研究。两位作者独立进行研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。
1项RCT和8项体外研究符合纳入标准。7项研究被归类为具有高偏倚风险,而2项体外研究被评为具有中度偏倚风险。结果表明,WSL漂白可减少龋损区与未受影响区域之间的颜色差异,但证据的确定性非常低。高度的方法学异质性使得无法通过汇总估计对结果进行有效解释。
本系统综述的结果不能支持或反驳漂白作为正畸后WSL管理有效方法的观点。由于该领域的大多数研究是体外研究,且低偏倚风险的可靠科学证据稀缺,因此有必要进行进一步的前瞻性体内研究。