CMR for myocardial iron overload quantification: calibration curve from the MIOT Network.

OBJECTIVES

R2* cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) allows the non-invasive measurement of myocardial iron. We calibrated cardiac R2* values against myocardial tissue-measured iron concentration by using a segmental approach and we assessed the iron distribution.

METHODS

Five hearts of thalassemia patients were donated after death/transplantation to the CoreLab of the Myocardial Iron Overload in Thalassemia Network. A multislice multiecho R2* approach was adopted. After CMR, used as guidance, the heart was cut in three short-axis slices and each slice was cut into different equiangular segments according to AHA segmentation and differentiated into endocardial and epicardial layers. Tissue iron concentration was measured by atomic absorption spectrometer technique.

RESULTS

Fifty-five samples were used since only for two hearts all the 16 samples were analyzed. Mean iron concentration was 4.71 ± 4.67 mg/g dw. Segmental iron levels ranged from 0.24 to 13.78 mg/g dw. The coefficient of variability of iron for myocardial segments ranged from 8.08 to 24.54% (mean 13.49 ± 6.93%). Iron concentration was significantly higher in the epicardial than in the endocardial layer (5.99 ± 6.01 vs 4.84 ± 4.87 mg/g dw; p = 0.042). Four different circumferential regions (anterior, septal, inferior, and lateral) were defined. A circumferential heterogeneity was noted, with more iron in the anterior region, followed by the inferior region. The direct nonlinear fitting of R2* and [Fe] data led to the calibration curve: [Fe] = 0.0022 ∙ (R2*-ROI) (R-square = 0.956).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data further validate R2* CMR using a segmental approach as a sensitive and early technique for quantifying iron distribution in the current clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

• Calibration in humans for cardiovascular magnetic resonance R2* against myocardial iron concentration was provided. • A circumferential heterogeneity in cardiac iron distribution was detected: more iron was observed in the anterior region, followed by the inferior region. This finding corroborates the use of a segmental T2* CMR approach in the clinical practice to detect a heterogeneous iron distribution. • The comparison between the cardiac T2* values obtained with the region-based and the pixel-wise approaches showed a significant correlation and no significant difference but, in presence of significant iron load, the region-based approach resulted in significantly higher T2* values.