Centre d'AMP, Ramsay Santé, Hôpital Privé de Parly 2, 21 rue Moxouris, 78150 Le Chesnay, France.
Centre de Biologie Médicale, Hôpital Privé de Parly 2, 21 rue Moxouris, 78150 Le Chesnay, France.
Hum Reprod. 2020 Feb 29;35(2):283-292. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez277.
How do manufacturers perform embryotoxicity testing in their quality control programs when validating IVF consumables?
The Mouse Embryo Assay (MEA) and Human Sperm Survival Assay (HSSA) used for IVF disposables differed from one manufacturer to another.
Many components used in IVF laboratories, such as culture media and disposable consumables, may negatively impact human embryonic development.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Through a questionnaire-based survey, the main manufacturers of IVF disposable devices were contacted during the period November to December 2018 to compare the methodology of the MEA and HSSA. We focused on catheters for embryo transfer, catheters for insemination, straws, serological pipettes, culture dishes and puncture needles used in the ART procedures.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We approached the manufacturers of IVF disposables and asked for details about methodology of the MEA and HSSA performed for toxicity testing of their IVF disposable devices. All specific parameters like mouse strains, number of embryos used, culture conditions (media, temperature, atmosphere), extraction protocol, subcontracting, and thresholds were registered and compared between companies.
Twenty-one companies were approached, of which only 11 answered the questionnaire. Significant differences existed in the methodologies and thresholds of the MEA and HSSA used for toxicity testing of IVF disposables. Importantly, some of these parameters could influence the sensitivity of the tests.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although we approached the main IVF manufacturers, the response rate was relatively low.
Our study confirms the high degree of heterogeneity of the embryotoxicity tests performed by manufacturers when validating their IVF disposable devices. Currently, no regulations exist on this issue. Professionals should call for and request standardization and a future higher degree of transparency as regards embryotoxicity testing from supplying companies; moreover, companies should be urged to provide the users clear and precise information about the results of their tests and how testing was performed. Future recommendations are urgently awaited to improve the sensitivity and reproducibility of embryotoxicity assays over time.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study did not receive any funding. L.D. declares a competing interest with Patrick Choay SAS.
N/A.
当验证体外受精耗材时,制造商如何在其质量控制计划中进行胚胎毒性测试?
用于体外受精耗材的小鼠胚胎测定(MEA)和人精子存活测定(HSSA)因制造商而异。
体外受精实验室中使用的许多组件,如培养基和一次性耗材,可能会对人类胚胎发育产生负面影响。
研究设计、大小、持续时间:2018 年 11 月至 12 月期间,通过基于问卷调查的方式联系体外受精一次性设备的主要制造商,以比较 MEA 和 HSSA 的方法。我们专注于胚胎移植导管、授精导管、吸管、血清移液管、ART 过程中使用的培养皿和穿刺针。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:我们联系了体外受精耗材的制造商,并询问了有关其体外受精一次性设备的毒性测试中 MEA 和 HSSA 方法的详细信息。所有特定参数,如鼠种、使用的胚胎数量、培养条件(培养基、温度、气氛)、提取方案、分包和阈值,都在公司之间进行了登记和比较。
联系了 21 家公司,其中只有 11 家回答了问卷。用于体外受精耗材毒性测试的 MEA 和 HSSA 的方法和阈值存在显著差异。重要的是,其中一些参数可能会影响测试的灵敏度。
局限性、谨慎的原因:尽管我们联系了主要的体外受精制造商,但回复率相对较低。
我们的研究证实了制造商在验证其体外受精一次性设备时进行胚胎毒性测试的高度异质性。目前,关于这个问题没有任何规定。专业人员应该呼吁并要求供应公司对胚胎毒性测试进行标准化和未来更高程度的透明化;此外,应敦促公司向用户提供关于其测试结果以及如何进行测试的清晰和准确信息。迫切需要提出未来建议,以提高胚胎毒性测定的灵敏度和重现性。
研究资金/竞争利益:本研究没有获得任何资金。L.D. 对 Patrick Choay SAS 有竞争利益。
无。