Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2020 Mar 10;27(5):275-283. doi: 10.1530/ERC-19-0468.
Overall survival (OS) is considered as the standard measure of outcome in oncology. However, considering that resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (Pan-NENs) usually have a long OS, the feasibility of prospective studies is questionable due to a long follow-up period needed. The primary endpoint was to validate the use of disease-free survival (DFS) as a surrogate measure of OS. The secondary endpoint was to calculate the gain in sample size using DFS instead of OS in hypothetical prospective studies with two parallel groups. A systematic review of studies reporting both OS and DFS in resected Pan-NENs was carried out. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to evaluate if DFS predicts the OS in patients undergoing radical resection. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to estimate the gain in sample size, supposing the use of DFS instead of OS, to evaluate a hypothetical adjuvant treatment after surgery in a randomized trial. Six studies reporting data about seven cohorts of resected Pan-NENs were included, for a total of 1088 patients. The median OS and DFS were 144 (27–134) and 122 (50–267) months, respectively. There was a significant correlation between DFS and OS (R2 = 0.988; P = 0.035). Monte Carlo simulations showed that the number of patients needed to demonstrate a significant reduction of probability of a ‘target event’ in a hypothetical two-arm group exploring the hypothetical role of adjuvant therapy was reduced using DFS instead OS. This finding supports the legitimacy of using DFS as an acceptable surrogate for OS in surgical clinical trials.
总生存期(OS)被认为是肿瘤学中评估疗效的标准指标。然而,考虑到可切除的胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(Pan-NENs)通常具有较长的 OS,由于需要长期随访,前瞻性研究的可行性值得怀疑。主要终点是验证无病生存期(DFS)作为 OS 的替代指标的可行性。次要终点是通过使用 DFS 而不是 OS 计算在具有两个平行组的假设前瞻性研究中增加样本量。对报告切除的 Pan-NENs 中 OS 和 DFS 的研究进行了系统回顾。采用多变量线性回归分析评估 DFS 是否可以预测接受根治性切除术的患者的 OS。通过蒙特卡罗模拟来估计样本量的增加,假设在随机试验中使用 DFS 代替 OS 来评估手术后的辅助治疗效果。纳入了 6 项报告了切除的 Pan-NENs 数据的研究,共纳入了 1088 名患者。中位 OS 和 DFS 分别为 144(27-134)和 122(50-267)个月。DFS 和 OS 之间存在显著相关性(R2=0.988;P=0.035)。蒙特卡罗模拟表明,在假设的两个臂组探索辅助治疗的假设作用的假设性临床试验中,使用 DFS 代替 OS 可以减少证明“目标事件”概率显著降低所需的患者数量。这一发现支持在外科临床试验中使用 DFS 作为 OS 的可接受替代指标的合理性。