Life Span Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1064-1076. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000829.
This systematic review is designed to (a) describe measures used to quantify vocal development in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users, (b) synthesize the evidence on prelinguistic vocal development in young children before and after cochlear implantation, and (c) analyze the application of the current evidence for evaluating change in vocal development before and after cochlear implantation for young children. Investigations of prelinguistic vocal development after cochlear implantation are only beginning to uncover the expected course of prelinguistic vocal development in children with CIs and what factors influence that course, which varies substantially across pediatric CI users. A deeper understanding of prelinguistic vocal development will improve professionals' abilities to determine whether a child with a CI is exhibiting sufficient progress soon after implantation and to adjust intervention as needed.
We systematically searched PubMed, ProQuest, and CINAHL databases for primary reports of children who received a CI before 5 years 0 months of age that included at least one measure of nonword, nonvegetative vocalizations. We also completed supplementary searches.
Of the 1916 identified records, 59 met inclusion criteria. The included records included 1125 total participants, which came from 36 unique samples. Records included a median of 8 participants and rarely included children with disabilities other than hearing loss. Nearly all of the records met criteria for level 3 for quality of evidence on a scale of 1 (highest) to 4 (lowest). Records utilized a wide variety of vocalization measures but often incorporated features related to canonical babbling. The limited evidence from pediatric CI candidates before implantation suggests that they are likely to exhibit deficits in canonical syllables, a critical vocal development skill, and phonetic inventory size. Following cochlear implantation, multiple studies report similar patterns of growth, but faster rates producing canonical syllables in children with CIs than peers with comparable durations of robust hearing. However, caution is warranted because these demonstrated vocal development skills still occur at older chronological ages for children with CIs than chronological age peers with typical hearing.
Despite including a relatively large number of records, the evidence in this review regarding changes in vocal development before and after cochlear implantation in young children remains limited. A deeper understanding of when prelinguistic skills are expected to develop, factors that explain deviation from that course, and the long-term impacts of variations in vocal prelinguistic development is needed. The diverse and dynamic nature of the relatively small population of pediatric CI users as well as relatively new vocal development measures present challenges for documenting and predicting vocal development in pediatric CI users before and after cochlear implantation. Synthesizing results across multiple institutions and completing rigorous studies with theoretically motivated, falsifiable research questions will address a number of challenges for understanding prelinguistic vocal development in children with CIs and its relations with other current and future skills. Clinical implications include the need to measure prelinguistic vocalizations regularly and systematically to inform intervention planning.
本系统综述旨在:(a)描述用于量化儿科人工耳蜗植入(CI)使用者言语发展的测量方法;(b)综合婴幼儿植入前和植入后语言前发声发展的证据;(c)分析当前证据在评估婴幼儿植入前后言语发展变化中的应用。对植入后语言前发声发展的研究才刚刚开始揭示植入 CI 的儿童语言前发声发展的预期过程,以及哪些因素影响这一过程,而这在儿科 CI 使用者中差异很大。更深入地了解语言前发声发展将提高专业人员的能力,使其能够确定植入后不久的 CI 儿童是否表现出足够的进展,并根据需要调整干预措施。
我们系统地检索了 PubMed、ProQuest 和 CINAHL 数据库,以获取在 5 岁零 0 个月之前接受 CI 的儿童的主要报告,这些报告至少包括一项非词、非植物性发声的测量。我们还完成了补充搜索。
在 1916 条确定的记录中,有 59 条符合纳入标准。纳入的记录包括 1125 名参与者,来自 36 个独立样本。记录的中位数为 8 名参与者,很少包括听力损失以外的其他残疾儿童。几乎所有的记录在证据质量方面都达到了 1 级(最高)到 4 级(最低)的 3 级标准。记录使用了各种发声测量方法,但通常包含与经典咿呀语相关的特征。在植入前的儿科 CI 候选者中,有限的证据表明,他们可能在典型音节、关键言语发展技能和语音词汇量方面存在缺陷。植入后,多项研究报告了类似的增长模式,但 CI 儿童产生典型音节的速度比具有相似稳健听力持续时间的同龄人更快。然而,需要谨慎,因为对于 CI 儿童来说,这些表现出的言语发展技能仍然出现在比具有典型听力的同龄儿童更晚的年龄。
尽管本综述纳入了相对较多的记录,但关于婴幼儿植入前后言语发展变化的证据仍然有限。需要更深入地了解语言前技能何时预期发展,解释偏离该过程的因素,以及言语前语言发展的长期影响。儿科 CI 使用者数量相对较少,且具有多样性和动态性,以及相对较新的言语发展测量方法,这给记录和预测植入前后儿科 CI 使用者的言语发展带来了挑战。通过多个机构综合结果,并完成具有理论动机、可证伪研究问题的严格研究,将解决理解 CI 儿童语言前发声发展及其与其他当前和未来技能的关系的许多挑战。临床意义包括需要定期系统地测量语言前发声,以告知干预计划。