• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听力损失婴儿与听力正常婴儿的发声比较:第一部分——语音发展

Vocalizations of infants with hearing loss compared with infants with normal hearing: Part I--phonetic development.

作者信息

Moeller Mary Pat, Hoover Brenda, Putman Coille, Arbataitis Katie, Bohnenkamp Greta, Peterson Barbara, Wood Sharon, Lewis Dawna, Pittman Andrea, Stelmachowicz Pat

机构信息

Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):605-27. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812564ab.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812564ab
PMID:17804976
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Infants with hearing loss are known to be slower to develop spoken vocabulary than peers with normal hearing. Previous research demonstrates that they differ from normal-hearing children in several aspects of prelinguistic vocal development. Less is known about the vocalizations of early-identified infants with access to current hearing technologies. This longitudinal study documents changes in prelinguistic vocalizations in early-identified infants with varying degrees of hearing loss, compared with a group of infants with normal hearing. It was hypothesized that infants with hearing loss would demonstrate phonetic delays and that selected aspects of phonetic learning may be differentially affected by restricted auditory access.

DESIGN

The vocalizations and early verbalizations of 21 infants with normal hearing and 12 early-identified infants with hearing loss were compared over a period of 14 mo (from 10 to 24 mo of age). Thirty-minute mother-child interaction sessions were video recorded at 6- to 8-wk intervals in a laboratory playroom setting. Syllable complexity changes and consonantal development were quantified from vocalizations and early verbalizations. Early behaviors were related to speech production measures at 36 mo of age. Participants with hearing loss were recruited from local audiology clinics and early intervention programs. Participants with normal hearing were recruited through day care centers and pediatrician offices.

RESULTS

Relative to age-matched, normal-hearing peers, children with hearing loss were delayed in the onset of consistent canonical babble. However, certain children with moderately-severe losses babbled on time, and infants with cochlear implants babbled within 2 to 6 mo of implantation. The infants with hearing loss had smaller consonantal inventories and were slower to increase syllable shape complexity than age-matched normal-hearing peers. The overall pattern of results suggested that consonant development in infants with hearing loss was delayed but not qualitatively different from children with normal hearing. Delays appeared to be less pronounced than suggested by previous research. However, fricative/affricate development progressed slowly in infants with hearing loss and divergence from the patterns of normal-hearing children was observed. Six children (2 with normal hearing; 4 with hearing loss) were identified as atypical, based on their rates of development. At 24 mo of age, these children persisted in producing a high proportion (0.59) of vocalizations lacking consonants, which was negatively correlated with Goldman-Fristoe scores at 36 mo (r = -0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that early-identified children are delayed in consonant and syllable structure development, which may influence early word learning rates. Fricative/affricate development appears to be challenging for some infants with hearing loss. This may be related to the effects of sensorineural hearing loss on high-frequency information, restricted bandwidth provided by amplification, and reduced audibility in contexts of noise and reverberation. Delayed fricative use may have implications for morphological development. Atypically slow rates of change in syllable development may indicate that a child is at risk for delayed speech development.

摘要

目的

众所周知,听力损失婴儿的口语词汇发展比听力正常的同龄人要慢。先前的研究表明,他们在语言前发声发展的几个方面与听力正常的儿童不同。对于早期确诊且能使用当前听力技术的婴儿的发声情况,我们了解得较少。这项纵向研究记录了不同程度听力损失的早期确诊婴儿在语言前发声方面的变化,并与一组听力正常的婴儿进行了比较。研究假设是,听力损失婴儿会出现语音延迟,并且语音学习的某些方面可能会受到有限听觉接触的不同影响。

设计

对21名听力正常的婴儿和12名早期确诊有听力损失的婴儿在14个月(从10个月到24个月大)的时间里的发声和早期言语进行了比较。在实验室游戏室环境中,每隔6至8周对30分钟的母婴互动环节进行视频记录。从发声和早期言语中量化音节复杂性变化和辅音发展情况。早期行为与36个月大时的言语产生指标相关。有听力损失的参与者是从当地听力诊所和早期干预项目中招募的。听力正常的参与者是通过日托中心和儿科医生办公室招募的。

结果

与年龄匹配的听力正常同龄人相比,听力损失儿童在持续规范牙牙学语的开始时间上有所延迟。然而,某些中重度听力损失的儿童按时开始牙牙学语,接受人工耳蜗植入的婴儿在植入后2至6个月内开始牙牙学语。与年龄匹配的听力正常同龄人相比,听力损失婴儿的辅音库较小,音节形状复杂性增加得较慢。总体结果模式表明,听力损失婴儿的辅音发展有所延迟,但在质量上与听力正常的儿童没有差异。延迟似乎没有先前研究表明的那么明显。然而,听力损失婴儿的擦音/塞擦音发展进展缓慢,并且观察到与听力正常儿童的模式有所不同。根据发展速度,确定了6名儿童(2名听力正常;4名听力损失)为非典型。在24个月大时,这些儿童持续发出高比例(0.59)的无辅音发声,这与36个月时的戈德曼-弗里斯托分数呈负相关(r = -0.60)。

结论

结果表明,早期确诊的儿童在辅音和音节结构发展方面有所延迟,这可能会影响早期单词学习速度。对于一些听力损失婴儿来说,擦音/塞擦音发展似乎具有挑战性。这可能与感音神经性听力损失对高频信息的影响、放大设备提供的有限带宽以及在噪声和混响环境中可听度降低有关。延迟使用擦音可能对形态发展有影响。音节发展中异常缓慢的变化速度可能表明儿童存在言语发展延迟的风险。

相似文献

1
Vocalizations of infants with hearing loss compared with infants with normal hearing: Part I--phonetic development.听力损失婴儿与听力正常婴儿的发声比较:第一部分——语音发展
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):605-27. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812564ab.
2
Vocalizations of infants with hearing loss compared with infants with normal hearing: Part II--transition to words.与听力正常婴儿相比,听力损失婴儿的发声:第二部分——向单词的过渡。
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):628-42. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812564c9.
3
Typical consonant cluster acquisition in auditory-verbal children with early-identified severe/profound hearing loss.早期确诊为重度/极重度听力损失的听障儿童通过听觉言语康复对典型辅音连缀的习得情况。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Feb;16(1):69-81. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2013.808698. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
4
Auditory sensitivity and the prelinguistic vocalizations of early-amplified infants.早期接受听力放大的婴儿的听觉敏感性和语言前发声
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Aug;49(4):809-22. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/057).
5
Receptive language and speech production in children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony type hearing loss.听觉神经病/失同步型听力损失儿童的接受性语言和言语产生
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):694-702. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f71de.
6
Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.儿童言语识别分数:言语可懂度指数以及年龄和听力水平的熟练度因素。
Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):543-56. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181734a02.
7
Longitudinal development of phonology and morphology in children with late-identified mild-moderate sensorineural hearing loss.晚发性轻中度感音神经性听力损失儿童语音和形态学的纵向发展。
Ear Hear. 2010 Oct;31(5):625-35. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181df5cc2.
8
Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for young children: Audiological criteria and optimizing age at implantation.为幼儿推荐人工耳蜗植入的循证指南:听力学标准及优化植入年龄
Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 2:S9-S18. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2016.1157268. Epub 2016 May 4.
9
Comparison of outcomes in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants.助听器与人工耳蜗植入儿童的疗效比较。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2012 Feb;13(1):5-15. doi: 10.1179/146701011X12950038111611.
10
A descriptive analysis of language and speech skills in 4- to 5-yr-old children with hearing loss.对 4 至 5 岁听力损失儿童的语言和言语技能进行描述性分析。
Ear Hear. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):605-16. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31821348ae.

引用本文的文献

1
Consonant Proficiency in Children With and Without Hearing Impairment Assessed With Profiles of Early Expressive Phonological Skills - Swedish (PEEPS-SE).使用早期表达性语音技能概况 - 瑞典语(PEEPS-SE)评估有和无听力障碍儿童的辅音熟练度。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Sep-Oct;60(5):e70118. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70118.
2
Objective Voice Analysis in Partial Deafness: Comparison of Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) and VOXplot Results.部分耳聋患者的客观嗓音分析:多维嗓音程序(MDVP)与VOXplot结果的比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 14;13(24):7631. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247631.
3
Brain networks in newborns and infants with and without sensorineural hearing loss: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.
有和没有感音神经性听力损失的新生儿和婴儿的脑网络:一项功能近红外光谱研究。
World J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 19;14(10):1547-1557. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i10.1547.
4
Outcomes of Aural Rehabilitation Provided in Person or by Telehealth Among Deaf/Hard of Hearing Young Children with Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids.人工或远程医疗提供的助听康复服务对植入人工耳蜗或佩戴助听器的聋/重听幼儿的影响。
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Oct;30(10):2608-2619. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0634. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
5
Improvement in quality of life comparing noninvasive versus invasive hearing rehabilitation in children.比较儿童非侵入性与侵入性听力康复的生活质量改善情况。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Feb 23;8(2):591-598. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1030. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
The Importance of High-Frequency Bandwidth on Speech and Language Development in Children: A Review of Patricia Stelmachowicz's Contributions to Pediatric Audiology.高频带宽对儿童言语和语言发育的重要性:关于帕特里夏·斯泰尔马乔维茨对儿科听力学贡献的综述
Semin Hear. 2023 Mar 1;44(Suppl 1):S3-S16. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1764138. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Quantifying Access to Speech in Children with Hearing Loss: The Influence of the Work of Pat Stelmachowicz on Measures of Audibility.量化听力损失儿童的言语可及性:帕特·斯泰尔马乔维茨的工作对可听度测量的影响。
Semin Hear. 2023 Mar 1;44(Suppl 1):S17-S28. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1764136. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Auditory Experience, Speech Sound Production Growth, and Early Literacy in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.听经历、言语声音产生发展与听障儿童早期读写能力
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Sep 7;31(5):2092-2107. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00400. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
9
Asking parents about babbling at 10 months produced valid answers but did not predict language screening result 2 years later.在 10 个月大时询问父母有关咿呀学语的情况可以得到有效答案,但不能预测 2 年后的语言筛查结果。
Acta Paediatr. 2022 Oct;111(10):1914-1920. doi: 10.1111/apa.16486. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
10
Objectively measured teacher and preschooler vocalizations: Phonemic diversity is associated with language abilities.客观测量的教师和学龄前儿童发声:音位多样性与语言能力相关。
Dev Sci. 2022 Mar;25(2):e13177. doi: 10.1111/desc.13177. Epub 2021 Oct 8.