School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia.
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 13;15(2):e0229006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229006. eCollection 2020.
Nature play is growing in popularity as children's play spaces are transforming from traditional playgrounds into more nature-based play spaces with considerable financial and resource investment from government bodies. This has resulted in the re-development of children's play spaces to incorporate more natural elements such as trees, plants and rocks. Despite this, it is unclear whether there is empirical evidence to support claims that play in nature is beneficial for child health and development.
To conduct a systematic review examining the impacts of nature play on the health and developmental outcomes of children aged 2-12 years.
Seven electronic databases were searched (MEDLINE, ERIC, Embase, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, The Joanna Briggs Institute and Emcare) from inception to July/August 2018 (search updated July/August 2019). The Inclusion criteria were children aged 2-12 years with no health/developmental conditions. The exposure/intervention of interest was unstructured, free play in nature. Critical appraisal of included studies was conducted using the McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool. Descriptive synthesis was then undertaken using the NHMRC FORM Framework.
Out of 2927 articles identified, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. The nature play exposure/intervention was heterogeneously described, and a plethora of outcome measures were used. Nature play had consistent positive impacts on physical activity outcomes and cognitive play behaviours (imaginative and dramatic play). However, there remain some concerns regarding the quality of the evidence base, heterogeneity in intervention description and parameters in the outcome measures used.
While the positive impacts of nature play were encouraging in terms of physical activity and cognitive development, nature play stakeholders should focus on producing a universal definition for nature play, the development of standardised outcome measures and the conduct of robust research designs. Implications of these findings suggest the need for the development of standardised guidelines to inform practice and policy in the design of children's play spaces in different contexts.
随着儿童游乐空间从传统游乐场转变为更具自然特色的游乐空间,政府机构投入了大量的资金和资源,自然游戏越来越受欢迎。这导致了儿童游乐空间的重新开发,纳入了更多的自然元素,如树木、植物和岩石。尽管如此,目前尚不清楚是否有实证证据支持在自然界中玩耍对儿童健康和发展有益的说法。
系统评价自然游戏对 2-12 岁儿童健康和发展结果的影响。
从建库到 2018 年 7 月/8 月(更新于 2019 年 7 月/8 月),在 7 个电子数据库(MEDLINE、ERIC、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane 图书馆、Joanna Briggs 研究所和 Emcare)中进行了搜索。纳入标准为年龄在 2-12 岁、无健康/发育状况的儿童。感兴趣的暴露/干预措施是自然环境中的无组织、自由玩耍。使用 McMaster 批判性评估工具对纳入的研究进行了批判性评估。然后使用 NHMRC FORM 框架进行描述性综合。
在确定的 2927 篇文章中,有 16 篇符合纳入标准。自然游戏暴露/干预措施的描述存在很大差异,并且使用了大量的结果测量指标。自然游戏对身体活动结果和认知游戏行为(想象和戏剧性游戏)有一致的积极影响。然而,仍然存在一些对证据基础质量、干预措施描述和使用的结果测量参数的担忧。
尽管自然游戏对身体活动和认知发展的积极影响令人鼓舞,但自然游戏利益相关者应专注于为自然游戏制定通用定义、开发标准化的结果测量指标以及进行稳健的研究设计。这些发现的意义表明,需要制定标准化指南,以便在不同背景下设计儿童游乐空间时为实践和政策提供信息。