Suppr超能文献

回复 Kiaei 和 Molinaro 医生关于发表的“桥联免疫分析法与两种生物分析法检测和区分促甲状腺素受体抗体的比较”一文。

Reply to Drs. Kiaei and Molinaro Regarding the Publication "Comparison of a Bridge Immunoassay with Two Bioassays for Thyrotropin Receptor Antibody Detection and Differentiation".

机构信息

Medical Faculty, Division for Specific Endocrinology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf , Germany.

Department of Medicine I, Molecular Thyroid Research Laboratory, Johannes Gutenberg University (JGU) Medical Center, Mainz , Germany.

出版信息

Horm Metab Res. 2020 Feb;52(2):126-127. doi: 10.1055/a-1089-8026. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

Abstract

Dear Editor,Drs. Kiaei and Molinaro 1 put forth two criticisms of the manuscript published by us 2. They state that the experimental design of this study is flawed and that the authors falsely claim that negative Thyretain™ TSI Reporter BioAssay results for two Graves' diseases patients undergoing drug treatments means the absence of stimulating antibodies. To substantiate this claim Drs. Kiaei and Molinaro point out that the manufacturer of the Thyretain TSI Reporter BioAssay clearly states in the package insert that "[t]he effects of various drug therapies on the performance of this Kit have not been established" 1. Second, the package insert explicitly states that "[a] negative result does not exclude the possibility of the presence of TSI" and results of the test should be interpreted in conjunction with information available from other clinical information, such as physical symptoms and thyroid hormone testing, as recommended by the American Thyroid Association (ATA)". Furthermore they state that the "authors of the manuscript did not consider the manufacturer's warning regarding the intended patient population and the ATA guidelines regarding the interpretation of the test results in conjunction with other clinical information. Instead, the authors based their conclusions on the negative Thyretain TSI Reporter BioAssay results and ignored the patients' clinical history of Graves' disease."

摘要

尊敬的编辑

Kiaei 和 Molinaro 博士 1 对我们发表的论文提出了两点批评。他们指出,这项研究的实验设计存在缺陷,作者错误地声称,两名正在接受药物治疗的格雷夫斯病患者的 Thyretain TSI Reporter BioAssay 检测结果为阴性,这意味着不存在刺激抗体。为了证实这一说法,Kiaei 和 Molinaro 博士指出,Thyretain TSI Reporter BioAssay 的制造商在试剂盒的使用说明书中明确指出,“[t]his Kit 的各种药物治疗效果尚未确立” 1。其次,使用说明书明确指出,“[a] 阴性结果并不能排除 TSI 的存在可能性”,并且根据美国甲状腺协会(ATA)的建议,应将测试结果与来自其他临床信息(如身体症状和甲状腺激素检测)相结合进行解释。此外,他们还表示,“该论文的作者没有考虑制造商对目标患者人群的警告,以及 ATA 关于将测试结果与其他临床信息相结合进行解释的指南。相反,作者基于 Thyretain TSI Reporter BioAssay 检测结果为阴性的结果,忽略了患者的格雷夫斯病临床病史。”

相似文献

3
A Negative Thyretain TSI Bioassay Result does not Exclude the Possibility of the Presence of TSI.
Horm Metab Res. 2020 Feb;52(2):124-125. doi: 10.1055/a-1089-7906. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
A Negative Thyretain TSI Bioassay Result does not Exclude the Possibility of the Presence of TSI.
Horm Metab Res. 2020 Feb;52(2):124-125. doi: 10.1055/a-1089-7906. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
Thyrotropin Receptor Blocking Antibodies.促甲状腺素受体阻断抗体
Horm Metab Res. 2018 Dec;50(12):853-862. doi: 10.1055/a-0723-9023. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验