Hematology & Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Blood Cancer J. 2020 Feb 13;10(2):17. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-0273-x.
The evolving paradigm of continuous therapy and maintenance treatment approaches in multiple myeloma (MM) offers prolonged disease control and improved outcomes compared to traditional fixed-duration approaches. Potential benefits of long-term strategies include sustained control of disease symptoms, as well as continued cytoreduction and clonal control, leading to unmeasurable residual disease and the possibility of transforming MM into a chronic or functionally curable condition. "Continuous therapy" commonly refers to administering a doublet or triplet regimen until disease progression, whereas maintenance approaches typically involve single-agent or doublet treatment following more intensive prior therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or doublet, triplet, or even quadruplet induction therapy. However, the requirements for agents and regimens within these contexts are similar: treatments must be tolerable for a prolonged period of time, should not be associated with cumulative or chronic toxicity, should not adversely affect patients' quality of life, should ideally be convenient with a minimal treatment burden for patients, and should not impact the feasibility or efficacy of subsequent treatment at relapse. Multiple agents have been and are being investigated as long-term options in the treatment of newly diagnosed MM (NDMM), including the immunomodulatory drugs lenalidomide and thalidomide, the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib, and the monoclonal antibodies daratumumab, elotuzumab, and isatuximab. Here we review the latest results with long-term therapy approaches in three different settings in NDMM: (1) maintenance treatment post ASCT; (2) continuous frontline therapy in nontransplant patients; (3) maintenance treatment post-frontline therapy in the nontransplant setting. We also discuss evidence from key phase 3 trials. Our review demonstrates how the paradigm of long-term treatment is increasingly well-established across NDMM treatment settings, potentially resulting in further improvements in patient outcomes, and highlights key clinical issues that will need to be addressed in order to provide optimal benefit.
在多发性骨髓瘤 (MM) 中,不断发展的连续治疗和维持治疗方法与传统的固定疗程方法相比,提供了更长时间的疾病控制和更好的结果。长期策略的潜在好处包括持续控制疾病症状,以及持续的细胞减少和克隆控制,导致无法测量的残留疾病,并有可能将 MM 转化为慢性或功能性可治愈的疾病。“连续治疗”通常是指在疾病进展之前使用双联或三联方案进行治疗,而维持治疗方法通常是在自体干细胞移植 (ASCT) 或双联、三联甚至四联诱导治疗后,采用单药或双联方案进行治疗。然而,这些情况下的药物和方案要求相似:治疗必须能够耐受长时间,不应与累积或慢性毒性相关,不应对患者的生活质量产生不利影响,理想情况下,患者的负担最小,且不应影响复发时后续治疗的可行性或疗效。许多药物已被用于或正在研究作为新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤 (NDMM) 的长期治疗选择,包括免疫调节剂来那度胺和沙利度胺、蛋白酶体抑制剂硼替佐米、卡非佐米和伊沙佐米,以及单克隆抗体达雷妥尤单抗、埃罗妥珠单抗和依沙妥珠单抗。在此,我们综述了长期治疗方法在 NDMM 三种不同情况下的最新结果:(1)ASCT 后维持治疗;(2)非移植患者的连续一线治疗;(3)非移植环境中的一线治疗后维持治疗。我们还讨论了关键 III 期试验的证据。我们的综述表明,长期治疗的范例在 NDMM 治疗环境中越来越得到确立,这可能会进一步改善患者的预后,并强调了为提供最佳获益而需要解决的关键临床问题。