Iacobelli Simona, Schönland Stefan, Koster Linda, Blaise Didier, Nicholson Emma, Broers A E C, Chevallier Patrice, Reményi Péter, Folber František, Gribben John G, Nur Erfan, Rabin Neil, Collin Matthew, Gedde-Dahl Tobias, Bailey Katharine, Ferguson Paul, Stelljes Matthias, Bloor Adrian, Beksac Meral, Drozd-Sokolowska Joanna, Raj Kavita, Hayden Patrick J, Yakoub-Agha Ibrahim, McLornan Donal P, Kröger Nicolaus
Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
University Hospital of Heidelberg, Medical Department V, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1038/s41409-025-02675-2.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogenous malignant disease. Novel agents including bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have improved response rates and patient outcome, but the majority of patients ultimately still relapse. High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) remains standard care of treatment for transplant-eligible patients. While single auto-HCT is commonly used, a planned tandem auto-HCT or auto-allo approach remains controversial, based on conflicting results from clinical trials. Here we compared the outcome of 24,936 MM patients aged between 20 and 65 years who underwent first auto-HCT during 2002-2015, reported to the EBMT registry, of whom 3683 and 878 got tandem auto-HCT and auto-allo-HCT respectively. We used non-standard statistical approaches to account for time-dependence of treatments and of their effects, including models with multiple timescales and dynamic prediction. Differences were reported by graphs of hazard functions, hazard ratios and conditional probabilities over time. For both OS and PFS, there was a limited but persistent advantage for the tandem auto-HCT group compared to single auto-HCT, and a clear advantage for the auto-allo-HCT group over both other strategies in the longer term, albeit at the cost of higher early mortality.
多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种异质性恶性疾病。包括双特异性抗体和嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞在内的新型药物提高了缓解率和患者预后,但大多数患者最终仍会复发。对于符合移植条件的患者,高剂量化疗后进行自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HCT)仍然是标准的治疗方法。虽然单倍体auto-HCT常用,但基于临床试验相互矛盾的结果,计划中的串联auto-HCT或自体-异基因移植方法仍存在争议。在此,我们比较了2002年至2015年期间在EBMT登记处报告的24936例年龄在20至65岁之间接受首次auto-HCT的MM患者的预后,其中3683例和878例分别接受了串联auto-HCT和自体-异基因造血干细胞移植(auto-allo-HCT)。我们使用非标准统计方法来考虑治疗及其效果的时间依赖性,包括具有多个时间尺度的模型和动态预测。通过危险函数、危险比和随时间变化的条件概率图报告差异。对于总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),与单倍体auto-HCT相比,串联auto-HCT组有有限但持续的优势,从长期来看,auto-allo-HCT组比其他两种策略都有明显优势,尽管以更高的早期死亡率为代价。