• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从何处探寻市场中的道德准则?

Where to look for the morals in markets?

作者信息

Sutter Matthias, Huber Jürgen, Kirchler Michael, Stefan Matthias, Walzl Markus

机构信息

1Max Planck Institute Bonn, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

2University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Exp Econ. 2020;23(1):30-52. doi: 10.1007/s10683-019-09608-z. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10683-019-09608-z
PMID:32055232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6991999/
Abstract

There is a heated debate on whether markets erode social responsibility and moral behavior. However, it is a challenging task to identify and measure moral behavior in markets. Based on a theoretical model, we examine in an experiment the relation between trading volume, prices and moral behavior by setting up markets that either impose a negative externality on third parties or not. We find that moral behavior reveals itself in lower trading volume in markets with a negative externality, while prices mostly depend on the market structure. We further investigate individual characteristics that explain trading behavior in markets with negative externalities.

摘要

关于市场是否会侵蚀社会责任和道德行为存在激烈的争论。然而,识别和衡量市场中的道德行为是一项具有挑战性的任务。基于一个理论模型,我们通过建立对第三方施加或不施加负外部性的市场,在一项实验中研究交易量、价格与道德行为之间的关系。我们发现,在存在负外部性的市场中,道德行为表现为交易量较低,而价格主要取决于市场结构。我们进一步研究了解释存在负外部性市场中交易行为的个体特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f2e/6991999/ffe76d1ab2b4/10683_2019_9608_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f2e/6991999/f9b68eb9a3b7/10683_2019_9608_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f2e/6991999/ffe76d1ab2b4/10683_2019_9608_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f2e/6991999/f9b68eb9a3b7/10683_2019_9608_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f2e/6991999/ffe76d1ab2b4/10683_2019_9608_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Where to look for the morals in markets?从何处探寻市场中的道德准则?
Exp Econ. 2020;23(1):30-52. doi: 10.1007/s10683-019-09608-z. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
2
Morals and markets.道德与市场。
Science. 2013 May 10;340(6133):707-11. doi: 10.1126/science.1231566.
3
Markets and morals: an experimental survey study.市场与道德:一项实验性调查研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0127069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127069. eCollection 2015.
4
A New Grey Relational Analysis Model Based on the Characteristic of Inscribed Core (IC-GRA) and Its Application on Seven-Pilot Carbon Trading Markets of China.基于内接核特征的新型灰色关联分析模型(IC-GRA)及其在中国七个碳交易试点市场的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 31;16(1):99. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010099.
5
Speculation on commodities futures markets and destabilization of global food prices: exploring the connections.对商品期货市场的投机行为与全球粮食价格不稳定之间的关系探讨
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(3):465-83. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.3.f.
6
What makes a market transaction morally repugnant?是什么让市场交易在道德上令人反感?
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104644. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104644. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
7
The moral economy of ready-made food.现成食品的道德经济学。
Br J Sociol. 2018 Dec;69(4):1271-1292. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12333. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
8
Understanding market functionality and trading success.理解市场功能和交易成功。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 21;14(8):e0219606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219606. eCollection 2019.
9
An empirical analysis of the multimarket contact theory in pharmaceutical markets.制药市场中多市场接触理论的实证分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Jul;15(6):623-43. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0501-4. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
10
Stroke: a Hidden Danger of Margin Trading in Stock Markets.中风:股票市场融资融券交易中的一个隐患。
J Urban Health. 2015 Oct;92(5):995-1006. doi: 10.1007/s11524-015-9964-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Competition and moral behavior: A meta-analysis of forty-five crowd-sourced experimental designs.竞争与道德行为:四十五个众包实验设计的元分析。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 6;120(23):e2215572120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215572120. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
Expressive voting versus information avoidance: experimental evidence in the context of climate change mitigation.表达性投票与信息回避:减缓气候变化背景下的实验证据
Public Choice. 2023;194(1-2):45-74. doi: 10.1007/s11127-022-01016-x. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
3
Predicting Pro-environmental Intention and Behavior Based on Justice Sensitivity, Moral Disengagement, and Moral Emotions - Results of Two Quota-Sampling Surveys.

本文引用的文献

1
Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry.商业文化与银行业的不诚信行为。
Nature. 2014 Dec 4;516(7529):86-9. doi: 10.1038/nature13977. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
2
Morals and markets.道德与市场。
Science. 2013 May 10;340(6133):707-11. doi: 10.1126/science.1231566.
3
Affirmative action policies promote women and do not harm efficiency in the laboratory.平权行动政策有利于女性,且不会损害实验室的效率。
基于公平敏感性、道德推脱和道德情绪预测亲环境意图与行为——两项配额抽样调查结果
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 24;13:914366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.914366. eCollection 2022.
4
Robo-investment aversion.机器人投资厌恶。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239277. eCollection 2020.
Science. 2012 Feb 3;335(6068):579-82. doi: 10.1126/science.1211180.