• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国卓越癌症中心支持在临床试验中成功招募少数族裔的运营策略。

Operational strategies in US cancer centers of excellence that support the successful accrual of racial and ethnic minorities in clinical trials.

作者信息

Regnante Jeanne M, Richie Nicole, Fashoyin-Aje Lola, Hall Laura Lee, Highsmith Quita, Louis J'Aimee, Turner Kenneth, Hoover Spencer, Lee Simon Craddock, González Evelyn, Williams Erin, Adams Homer, Obasaju Coleman, Sargeant Ify, Spinner Jovonni, Reddick Christopher, Gandee Marianne, Geday Madeline, Dang Julie, Watson Rayneisha, Chen Moon S

机构信息

Center for Sustainable Health Care Quality and Equity, 1201 15th Street, NW, Suite 340, Washington, DC, 20005, USA.

Genentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, 94080, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jan 22;17:100532. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100532. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100532
PMID:32055746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7005557/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Study populations in clinical research must reflect US changing demographics, especially with the rise of precision medicine. However, racial and ethnic minority groups (REMGs) have low rates of participation in cancer clinical trials.

METHODS

Criteria were developed to identify cancer centers able to accrue a higher than average proportion of REMGs into clinical trials. Comprehensive interviews were conducted with leaders of these cancer centers to identify operational strategies contributing to enhanced accrual of REMGs.

RESULTS

Eight US cancer centers reported a REMG accrual rate range in cancer research between 10 and 50% in a 12-month reporting period and met other criteria for inclusion. Fourteen leaders participated in this assessment. Key findings were that centers: had a metric collection and reporting approach; routinely captured race and ethnicity data within databases accessible to research staff; had operational standards to support access and inclusion; developed practices to facilitate sustained patient participation during clinical trials; had strategies to decrease recruitment time and optimize clinical study design; and identified low-resource strategies for REMG accrual. There was also a clear commitment to establish processes that support the patient's provider as the key influencer of patient recruitment into clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

We have identified operational practices that facilitate increased inclusion of REMGs in cancer trials. In order to establish a sustainable cancer center inclusion research strategy, it is valuable to include an operational framework that is informed by leading US cancer centers of excellence.

摘要

背景

临床研究中的研究人群必须反映美国不断变化的人口结构,尤其是在精准医学兴起的情况下。然而,种族和少数族裔群体(REMGs)参与癌症临床试验的比例较低。

方法

制定了标准,以识别能够使REMGs参与临床试验的比例高于平均水平的癌症中心。对这些癌症中心的负责人进行了全面访谈,以确定有助于提高REMGs参与率的运营策略。

结果

8家美国癌症中心报告称,在12个月的报告期内,癌症研究中REMGs的参与率在10%至50%之间,并符合其他纳入标准。14位负责人参与了此次评估。主要发现是,这些中心:采用了指标收集和报告方法;在研究人员可访问的数据库中常规收集种族和族裔数据;有支持准入和纳入的运营标准;制定了促进患者在临床试验期间持续参与的做法;有减少招募时间和优化临床研究设计的策略;并确定了针对REMGs参与的低资源策略。此外,还明确承诺建立支持患者医疗服务提供者作为临床试验患者招募关键影响因素的流程。

结论

我们已经确定了有助于提高REMGs在癌症试验中参与率的运营做法。为了建立可持续的癌症中心纳入研究策略,纳入一个由美国领先的优秀癌症中心提供信息的运营框架是很有价值的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be06/7005557/2fe09dcc5f61/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be06/7005557/2fe09dcc5f61/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be06/7005557/2fe09dcc5f61/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Operational strategies in US cancer centers of excellence that support the successful accrual of racial and ethnic minorities in clinical trials.美国卓越癌症中心支持在临床试验中成功招募少数族裔的运营策略。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jan 22;17:100532. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100532. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
US Cancer Centers of Excellence Strategies for Increased Inclusion of Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Clinical Trials.美国癌症卓越中心增加临床试验中少数族裔参与的策略。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Apr;15(4):e289-e299. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00638. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
3
Enrollment of Racial and Ethnic Minoritized Groups in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trials: A Review of the Scope of the Problem, Contributing Factors, and Strategies to Improve Inclusion.妇科肿瘤临床试验中少数民族群体的纳入:问题范围、促成因素及改善纳入策略的综述
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar 1;66(1):22-35. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000765. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
4
Five National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers' data collection on racial/ethnic minority participation in therapeutic trials: a current view and opportunities for improvement.五个美国国家癌症研究所指定癌症中心关于少数民族参与治疗性试验的数据收集:现状和改进机会。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1113-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28571.
5
Perspectives on barriers and facilitators to minority recruitment for clinical trials among cancer center leaders, investigators, research staff, and referring clinicians: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT).癌症中心领导者、研究人员、研究人员和转诊临床医生对临床试验中少数民族招募的障碍和促进因素的看法:增强少数民族参与临床试验(EMPaCT)。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1097-105. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28574.
6
Perceived Institutional Barriers Among Clinical and Research Professionals: Minority Participation in Oncology Clinical Trials.临床和研究专业人员感知的机构障碍:少数族裔参与肿瘤学临床试验。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 May;17(5):e666-e675. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00970.
7
An institutional strategy to increase minority recruitment to therapeutic trials.一项增加少数民族参与治疗性试验的机构策略。
Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Oct;24(10):1797-809. doi: 10.1007/s10552-013-0258-1. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
8
Recruitment and Retention Strategies Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Web-Based Intervention Trials: Retrospective Qualitative Analysis.基于网络的干预试验中少数民族和种族群体的招募和保留策略:回顾性定性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 12;23(7):e23959. doi: 10.2196/23959.
9
HIV/AIDS: a minority health issue.艾滋病毒/艾滋病:一个少数群体的健康问题。
Med Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;89(4):895-912. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2005.03.005.
10
Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials.NIH 复兴法案颁布 20 年后:增强少数族裔参与临床试验(EMPaCT):为改善少数族裔临床试验入组奠定基础:重申增强少数族裔参与癌症临床试验的必要性。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1091-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28575.

引用本文的文献

1
Recruitment and retention strategies for improving representation in clinical research: A meta-synthesis.改善临床研究代表性的招募与留用策略:一项元综合分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0322796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322796. eCollection 2025.
2
Mixed-Methods Approach: Impact of Clinical Consenter Diversity on Clinical Trials Enrollment.混合方法研究:临床同意者多样性对临床试验入组的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;17(6):1043. doi: 10.3390/cancers17061043.
3
How to optimize and evaluate diversity in gynecologic cancer clinical trials: statements from the GCIG Barcelona Meeting.

本文引用的文献

1
US Cancer Centers of Excellence Strategies for Increased Inclusion of Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Clinical Trials.美国癌症卓越中心增加临床试验中少数族裔参与的策略。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Apr;15(4):e289-e299. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00638. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
2
Precision oncology- the future of personalized cancer medicine?精准肿瘤学——个性化癌症医学的未来?
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2017 Mar 20;1(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41698-017-0010-5. eCollection 2017.
3
Sexual Dimorphism of Immune Responses: A New Perspective in Cancer Immunotherapy.
如何优化和评估妇科癌症临床试验中的多样性:GCIG 巴塞罗那会议声明。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Nov 4;34(11):1677-1684. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005982.
4
Exploring Racial Disparities in Awareness and Perceptions of Oncology Clinical Trials: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Baseline Data From the mychoice Study.探索肿瘤学临床试验认知和观念方面的种族差异:mychoice 研究基线数据的横断面分析。
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Sep 30;10:e56048. doi: 10.2196/56048.
5
Ethnic Minority Participation in Clinical Trials from Latin America and the Caribbean: A Scoping Review.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区少数民族参与临床试验:范围综述。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Jun;26(3):604-622. doi: 10.1007/s10903-023-01578-y. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
6
REPRESENT recommendations: improving inclusion and trust in cancer early detection research.代表性建议:提高癌症早期检测研究的包容性和信任度。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Oct;129(8):1195-1208. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02414-8. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
7
Data-driven strategies for increasing patient diversity in Bristol Myers Squibb-sponsored US oncology clinical trials.基于数据的策略可提高百时美施贵宝赞助的美国肿瘤学临床试验中的患者多样性。
Clin Trials. 2023 Dec;20(6):585-593. doi: 10.1177/17407745231180506. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
8
Increasing Racial and Ethnic Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Cancer Treatment Trials: Evaluation of an ASCO-Association of Community Cancer Centers Site Self-Assessment.提高癌症治疗试验中的种族和民族公平、多样性和包容性:对 ASCO-社区癌症中心协会现场自我评估的评估。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Apr;19(4):e581-e588. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00560. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
9
Reimagining diversity in multiple myeloma clinical trials.重新构想多发性骨髓瘤临床试验中的多样性。
Hematol Oncol. 2022 Oct;40(4):689-694. doi: 10.1002/hon.2997. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
10
Clinical trial diversity: An opportunity for improved insight into the determinants of variability in drug response.临床试验多样性:提高对药物反应变异性决定因素的认识的机会。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jun;88(6):2700-2717. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15242. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
免疫应答的性别二态性:癌症免疫治疗的新视角。
Front Immunol. 2018 Mar 21;9:552. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00552. eCollection 2018.
4
Lower trial participation by culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) cancer patients is largely due to language barriers.文化和语言背景多样(CALD)的癌症患者参与临床试验的比例较低,这在很大程度上是由于语言障碍。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;14(1):52-60. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12818. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
Trial Reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov - The Final Rule.ClinicalTrials.gov 中的试验报告 - 最终规则。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1998-2004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1611785. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
6
Cancer statistics for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders, 2016: Converging incidence in males and females.2016年亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民的癌症统计数据:男性和女性发病率趋同。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 May;66(3):182-202. doi: 10.3322/caac.21335. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
7
Diversity in Clinical and Biomedical Research: A Promise Yet to Be Fulfilled.临床与生物医学研究中的多样性:尚未实现的承诺。
PLoS Med. 2015 Dec 15;12(12):e1001918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001918. eCollection 2015 Dec.
8
Effect of prior cancer on outcomes in advanced lung cancer: implications for clinical trial eligibility and accrual.既往癌症对晚期肺癌预后的影响:对临床试验入组资格和入组率的意义。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb 9;107(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv002. Print 2015 Apr.
9
Consent timing and experience: modifiable factors that may influence interest in clinical research.同意的时机和体验:可能影响对临床研究兴趣的可改变因素。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Mar;8(2):91-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000335. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
10
Addressing Cancer Disparities Among American Indians through Innovative Technologies and Patient Navigation: The Walking Forward Experience.通过创新技术和患者导航解决美国印第安人癌症差异:前进的经验。
Front Oncol. 2011 Jun 22;1:11. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2011.00011. eCollection 2011.