Marfenko Stephanie, Özcan Mutlu, Attin Thomas, Tauböck Tobias T
Private practice, Zurich, Switzerland.
Center for Dental Medicine, Division of Dental Biomaterials, Clinic for Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,
Am J Dent. 2020 Feb;33(1):33-38.
To evaluate the effect of different contamination media and cleaning regimens on the adhesion of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic.
Specimens (IPS e.max CAD) (n =15 per group) were etched with 5% hydrofluoric acid gel. While half of the specimens were silanized after etching, the other half was left etched only. After contamination with either saliva or dental stone, they were further divided into four subgroups depending on the cleaning regimens: water rinsing only (WR), 80% ethanol (E), 37% phosphoric acid (PA), cleaning gel (CG). All specimens were re-silanized, coated with adhesive resin (Heliobond) and resin cement (Variolink II) was bonded. After thermocycling (5.000x, 5-55°C), ceramic-cement interface was loaded under shear (1 mm/minute) and failure types were classified. Data (MPa) were analyzed using 3-way ANOVA, Dunnett-T3 tests and Weibull moduli were calculated.
Saliva contamination (4.7±2.2-15.4±2.7) resulted in significantly lower bond strength compared to dental stone (17.8±4.8-23.6±2.7). Silanization before contamination showed protective effect especially for saliva (20.1±4.5-24.7±3.9) compared to non-silanized groups (4.7±2.2-15.4±2.7). Weibull modulus was the lowest for saliva-contaminated groups after cleaning with WR (2.22, 5.01) or E (1.14, 5.77) without and with initial silanization, respectively. Adhesive failures (272 out of 285) were commonly observed in all groups. Saliva contamination decreased the adhesion of luting cement to lithium disilicate ceramic considerably more than dental stone contamination, but silanization prior to try-in prevented deterioration in adhesion.
Preliminary silanization of hydrofluoric acid etched lithium disilicate ceramic prior to saliva or dental stone contamination re-established resin luting cement adhesion, irrespective of the cleaning regimen used.
评估不同污染介质和清洁方案对树脂水门汀与二硅酸锂陶瓷粘结力的影响。
制备样本(IPS e.max CAD)(每组n = 15),用5%氢氟酸凝胶蚀刻。蚀刻后,一半样本进行硅烷化处理,另一半仅保留蚀刻状态。在用唾液或牙科石膏污染后,根据清洁方案将它们进一步分为四个亚组:仅用水冲洗(WR)、80%乙醇(E)、37%磷酸(PA)、清洁凝胶(CG)。所有样本重新进行硅烷化处理,涂覆粘结树脂(Heliobond)并粘结树脂水门汀(Variolink II)。热循环(5000次,5 - 55°C)后,对陶瓷 - 水门汀界面进行剪切加载(1毫米/分钟)并对破坏类型进行分类。使用三因素方差分析、Dunnett - T3检验分析数据(MPa)并计算威布尔模量。
与牙科石膏(17.8±4.8 - 23.6±2.7)相比,唾液污染(4.7±2.2 - 15.4±2.7)导致粘结强度显著降低。与未硅烷化组(4.7±2.2 - 15.4±2.7)相比,污染前进行硅烷化处理对唾液污染尤其具有保护作用(20.1±4.5 - 24.7±3.9)。在用WR(分别为2.22、5.01)或E(分别为1.14、5.77)清洁且有无初始硅烷化处理的情况下,唾液污染组的威布尔模量最低。在所有组中普遍观察到粘结失败(285例中有272例)。唾液污染比牙科石膏污染更显著地降低了粘结水门汀与二硅酸锂陶瓷的粘结力,但试戴前的硅烷化处理可防止粘结力下降。
在唾液或牙科石膏污染之前,对氢氟酸蚀刻的二硅酸锂陶瓷进行初步硅烷化处理,无论使用何种清洁方案,均可重新建立树脂粘结水门汀的粘结力。