Harouny Ryan, Hardan Louis, Harouny Elie, Kassis Cynthia, Bourgi Rim, Lukomska-Szymanska Monika, Kharouf Naji, Ball Vincent, Khairallah Carlos
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon.
Craniofacial Research Laboratory, Division of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;9(7):286. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9070286.
The salivary contamination occurring at the try-in procedures of lithium disilicate (LDS) can jeopardize their bond strength. Various laboratory reports have concluded that applying 37% phosphoric acid (HPO) could be considered as a predictable way of removing salivary contaminants. An experimental method that consists of sealing the intaglio of the ceramic restorations with a layer of cured adhesive could allow consequent time saving for dental practitioners. It is, besides, necessary to establish an optimal decontamination protocol. Hence, this study aimed to determine the most efficient surface treatment, before and after salivary contamination, by comparing the adhesion between resin and LDS. In order to do so, five groups of ten specimens ( = 10) each underwent the different types of surface treatments before bonding, followed by 2500 cycles in the thermocycler. A shear bond strength (SBS) test was then conducted on a universal testing machine (YLE GmbH Waldstraße Bad König, Germany), followed by a fracture-type analysis on an optical microscope (Olympus BX53, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan). Statistical analysis was set with a level of significance of α = 0.05. The surface treatment significantly affected the SBS results. The decontamination with HF (12.59 ± 2.71 MPa) and HPO (13.11 ± 1.03 MPa) obtained the highest values, silanizing only before contamination obtained intermediate values (11.74 ± 3.49 MPa), and silanizing both before and after the salivary contamination (10.41 ± 2.75 MPa) along with applying a bonding agent before contamination (9.65 ± 1.99 MPa) resulted in the lowest values. In conclusion, HPO proved to be efficient, thus, allowing the practitioner to avoid the clinical use of HF; it can, therefore, be considered as a valid alternative. Presilanization and resilanization of specimens, along with applying a bonding agent before contamination, did not yield satisfying results.
在二硅酸锂(LDS)试戴过程中发生的唾液污染会危及它们的粘结强度。各种实验室报告得出结论,应用37%的磷酸(HPO)可被视为去除唾液污染物的一种可预测方法。一种实验方法是用一层固化粘合剂密封陶瓷修复体的凹面,这可以为牙科医生节省后续时间。此外,有必要建立一个最佳的去污方案。因此,本研究旨在通过比较树脂与LDS之间的粘结力,确定唾液污染前后最有效的表面处理方法。为此,五组每组十个样本(n = 10)在粘结前进行不同类型的表面处理,然后在热循环仪中进行2500次循环。然后在万能试验机(德国巴德柯尼希瓦尔德施特拉ße的YLE GmbH)上进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试,随后在光学显微镜(日本东京新宿区奥林巴斯BX53)上进行断裂类型分析。统计分析设定显著性水平α = 0.05。表面处理显著影响SBS结果。用氢氟酸(HF,12.59±2.71MPa)和磷酸(HPO,13.11±1.03MPa)去污获得最高值,仅在污染前进行硅烷化获得中间值(11.74±3.49MPa),唾液污染前后都进行硅烷化(10.41±2.75MPa)以及在污染前应用粘结剂(9.65±1.99MPa)导致最低值。总之,磷酸被证明是有效的,因此,使从业者能够避免在临床中使用氢氟酸;因此,它可以被视为一种有效的替代方法。样本的预硅烷化和再硅烷化,以及在污染前应用粘结剂,都没有产生令人满意的结果。