Bizzi Fabiola, Shmueli-Goetz Yael, Castellano Rosetta, San Martini Pietro, Cavanna Donatella
Department of Educational Science, 9302University of Genoa, Italy.
4785Anna Freud Centre, London, UK; Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.
Psychol Rep. 2021 Feb;124(1):382-410. doi: 10.1177/0033294120905515. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
While attachment assessments developed for infancy and adulthood are well established, no such gold standard measure exists for school years, where measures are not yet sufficiently robust. Nevertheless, the last decade has witnessed some progress in this field with the development of the Child Attachment Interview (CAI), a semistructured interview designed to access children's mental representations of their attachment relationships. This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the CAI for an Italian population, using a normative group and a clinical group of disruptive behavior disorder and somatic symptom disorder patients. A total sample of 311 Italian children (213 normative and 98 clinical) aged 8 to 15 years completed a battery of measures assessing attachment, verbal IQ, and symptomatology. The psychometric properties of the CAI alongside other children (Kerns Security Scale, Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment) and parents (Adult Attachment Interview) attachment measures in normative sample, as well as the distribution of attachment patterns in normative and clinical samples, were examined. The results revealed the CAI to have adequate interrater and test-retest reliability, as well as discriminant, and convergent validity. Significant differences in the CAI's distribution of attachment patterns for normative and specific clinical groups were found. Taken together, the findings show that the CAI Italian version is a reliable and valid measure for assessing attachment in school years and beyond.
虽然针对婴儿期和成年期开发的依恋评估方法已经很成熟,但对于学龄期却没有这样的金标准测量方法,因为现有的测量方法还不够完善。然而,在过去十年中,随着儿童依恋访谈(CAI)的发展,该领域取得了一些进展。CAI是一种半结构化访谈,旨在了解儿童对其依恋关系的心理表征。本研究旨在使用一个正常对照组以及患有破坏性行为障碍和躯体症状障碍的临床组患者,来测试CAI在意大利人群中的有效性和可靠性。共有311名8至15岁的意大利儿童(213名正常儿童和98名临床儿童)完成了一系列评估依恋、言语智商和症状的测量。研究考察了CAI在正常样本中的心理测量特性,以及与其他儿童(克恩斯安全感量表、父母和同伴依恋量表)和父母(成人依恋访谈)的依恋测量方法相比,正常样本和临床样本中依恋模式的分布情况。结果显示,CAI具有足够的评分者间信度和重测信度,以及区分效度和聚合效度。研究发现,正常组和特定临床组在CAI依恋模式分布上存在显著差异。总体而言,研究结果表明,CAI意大利语版本是评估学龄期及以后依恋情况的可靠且有效的测量方法。