Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom; Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar;68:71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
Attachment theory proposes that humans develop representations of self and other in early childhood which are relatively stable across the life-course, and play a key role in psychological adaptation. However, to date, the psychometric properties of attachment measures in middle childhood and adolescence have not been evaluated in a systematic review.
A systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42017057772) was conducted using COSMIN criteria. Two researchers independently searched MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Embase databases for relevant articles.
Fifty-four studies were included in the review. The methodological quality of studies was typically fair or poor, with only a small number of studies being rated as of good or excellent quality. The measurement properties of attachment measures in this age group were frequently rated as inadequate according to COSMIN criteria. The Child Attachment Interview (CAI) has the best psychometric properties of the interview and projective measures, and the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA) the best evidence of the self-report measures. Overall, the evidence for the CAI and IPPA included both positive and negative findings relating to adequacy of measurement properties.
Attachment measures in middle childhood and adolescence currently have limited evidence for the adequacy of their psychometric properties.
依恋理论提出，人类在幼儿期形成对自我和他人的代表性认识，这些认识在整个生命周期中相对稳定，并在心理适应中起着关键作用。然而，迄今为止，在系统评价中尚未评估中年和青少年依恋测量的心理计量学特性。
使用 COSMIN 标准进行了系统评价（PROSPERO ID：CRD42017057772）。两位研究人员独立搜索了 MEDLINE、PsychINFO 和 Embase 数据库中相关的文章。
本综述共纳入 54 项研究。研究的方法学质量通常为一般或较差，仅有少数研究被评为良好或优秀。根据 COSMIN 标准，该年龄组依恋测量的测量特性经常被评为不充分。儿童依恋访谈（CAI）在访谈和投射测量中具有最佳的心理计量学特性，而父母和同伴依恋量表（IPPA）在自我报告测量中具有最佳的证据。总体而言，CAI 和 IPPA 的证据既包括与测量特性充分性相关的正面发现，也包括负面发现。
目前，中年和青少年依恋测量的心理计量学特性充分性的证据有限。
