Hamieh Nadine, Meneton Pierre, Zins Marie, Goldberg Marcel, Wiernik Emmanuel, Empana Jean-Philippe, Limosin Frederic, Melchior Maria, Lemogne Cedric
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, Équipe de Recherche en Épidémiologie Sociale, F75012, Paris, France.
INSERM U1142 LIMICS, UMRS 1142, Sorbonne Universities, UPMC University of Paris 06, University of Paris 13, Paris, France.
J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 1;266:381-386. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.164. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
Psychological factors such as hostility and depression have been associated with cardiovascular disease. However, their role in predicting incident cardiac events independently one of another is not clear.
Among 10,304 GAZEL middle-aged workers free of cardiovascular diseases in 1993, 581 incident cardiac events were validated from 1994-2014. Hostile traits (cognitive hostility, behavioral hostility, irritability and negativism) were assessed with the Buss and Durkee Hostility Inventory at baseline. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline and every three years with the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale. We used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate hazard ratios (HR) of hostile traits for incident cardiac events adjusting for baseline self-reported socio-demographics and family history of coronary heart diseases (model 1), then additionally for time-dependent depressive symptoms (either as a binary or continuous variable) (model 2) and for yearly self-reported modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (physical activity, smoking, body mass index, diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension) (model 3).
In Model 1, the only hostile trait associated with incident cardiac events was irritability (HR for one interquartile range: 1.16, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.32). This association was no longer statistically significant when further adjusting for depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms, in turn, remained significant predictors of cardiac events with HRs ranging from 1.40-1.49 (binary).
Hostility traits were measured only once.
Depressive symptoms might explain the association between irritability and cardiac events and should therefore be prioritized in interventions aiming to prevent cardiovascular disease. Further research is needed to identify the mechanisms underlying this association.
敌意和抑郁等心理因素与心血管疾病有关。然而,它们相互独立预测心脏事件发生的作用尚不清楚。
在1993年10304名无心血管疾病的GAZEL中年工人中,1994年至2014年期间确认了581例心脏事件。在基线时用Buss和Durkee敌意量表评估敌意特质(认知敌意、行为敌意、易怒和消极)。使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表在基线和每三年评估一次抑郁症状。我们使用Cox比例风险模型计算敌意特质对心脏事件发生的风险比(HR),首先调整基线自我报告的社会人口统计学和冠心病家族史(模型1),然后另外调整随时间变化的抑郁症状(作为二元或连续变量)(模型2)以及每年自我报告的可改变心血管危险因素(体力活动、吸烟、体重指数、糖尿病、血脂异常和高血压)(模型3)。
在模型1中,与心脏事件发生相关的唯一敌意特质是易怒(四分位数间距每增加一个单位的HR:1.16,95%置信区间:1.02 - 1.32)。进一步调整抑郁症状后,这种关联不再具有统计学意义。相反,抑郁症状仍然是心脏事件的显著预测因素,HR范围为1.40 - 1.49(二元变量)。
敌意特质仅测量了一次。
抑郁症状可能解释了易怒与心脏事件之间的关联,因此在旨在预防心血管疾病的干预措施中应优先考虑。需要进一步研究以确定这种关联的潜在机制。