Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, University of Passo Fundo, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, University of Passo Fundo, Brazil.
Dent Mater. 2020 Apr;36(4):535-541. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
To evaluate the cyclic contact fatigue resistance and failure mode of ceramics for monolithic and multilayer restorations.
Ceramic structures (10 mm × 1.8 mm) were fabricated as follows (n = 28): (1) CAD-on- trilayer structure composed of Y-TZP (yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal- IPS e.max ZirCAD) infrastructure, fusion glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD Crystall/Connect) and lithium disilicate-based glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD); (2) ZFC- bilayer structure composed of Y-TZP infrastructure veneered by a fluorapatite glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Ceram); (3) LDC- monolithic lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD); and (4) YZW- monolithic Y-TZP (Zenostar Zr Translucent). All ceramics structures were bonded to a dentin analog substrate (G10). Specimens were submitted to cyclic contact fatigue test in a pneumatic cycling machine with 80 N load and 2 Hz frequency in distilled water at 37 °C. Test was interrupted after 10, 10, 5 × 10 and 10 cycles and the presence or absence of failure was recorded. Fatigue data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (log rank) and Holm-Sidak tests (α = 0.05). The relationship between the type of crack leading to failure and the experimental group was analyzed using chi-square test (α = 0.05).
There was no statistical difference between CAD-on and YZW groups (p = 0.516), which presented the highest survival rates after cyclic loading, followed by ZFC and LDC groups (p < 0.01). There was a significant relationship between type of crack and experimental group (p < 0.001). LDC specimens showed the greatest frequency of radial cracks, while cone cracks were more prevalent for ZFC and CAD-on specimens.
Monolithic Y-TZP (YZW) showed similar fatigue resistance to CAD-on multilayer specimens, but different failure mode. Monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDC) and Y-TZP conventionally veneered by glass-ceramic (ZFC) showed lower survival time under fatigue.
评估单片和多层修复体用陶瓷的循环接触疲劳阻力和失效模式。
制作陶瓷结构(10mm×1.8mm)如下(n=28):(1)CAD-on-由氧化锆增韧四方多晶(氧化锆增韧四方多晶-IPS e.max ZirCAD)基础设施、熔附玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD Crystall/Connect)和锂硅玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD)组成的三层结构;(2)ZFC-由氧化锆增韧四方多晶基础设施覆盖氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max Ceram)组成的双层结构;(3)LDC-单片锂硅玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD);(4)YZW-单片氧化锆增韧四方多晶(Zenostar Zr 半透明)。所有陶瓷结构均与牙本质模拟基底(G10)结合。在 37°C 的蒸馏水中,使用气动循环机以 80N 负载和 2Hz 频率对标本进行循环接触疲劳试验。在 10、10、5×10 和 10 次循环后中断测试,并记录是否发生失效。使用 Kaplan-Meier(对数秩)和 Holm-Sidak 检验(α=0.05)分析疲劳数据。使用卡方检验(α=0.05)分析导致失效的裂纹类型与实验组之间的关系。
CAD-on 和 YZW 组之间无统计学差异(p=0.516),两组在循环加载后具有最高的存活率,其次是 ZFC 和 LDC 组(p<0.01)。裂纹类型与实验组之间存在显著关系(p<0.001)。LDC 标本出现放射状裂纹的频率最高,而 ZFC 和 CAD-on 标本则更常见锥形裂纹。
单片氧化锆增韧四方多晶(YZW)表现出与 CAD-on 多层标本相似的疲劳阻力,但失效模式不同。单片锂硅玻璃陶瓷(LDC)和传统玻璃陶瓷覆盖的氧化锆增韧四方多晶(ZFC)在疲劳下的存活时间较低。