Suppr超能文献

在综合内科病房使用标识作为干预措施,以减少不必要的检查。

Signage as an intervention on a general medicine ward to reduce unnecessary testing.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2021 Mar;51(3):398-403. doi: 10.1111/imj.14784.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Up to 30% of medical spending in developed countries is unnecessary. Unnecessary testing is not only wasteful economically, but can be injurious to patients. Studies have shown that interventions such as education, auditing, and restrictive ordering can reduce unnecessary testing. However, these interventions are time- and resource-intensive. We conducted a study to determine if the passive intervention of placing signs on clinicians' computers was effective in reducing unnecessary testing.

AIMS

To determine the effectiveness of signage on physicians' computers to limit unnecessary testing.

METHODS

We identified two acute medicine wards on which all orders are placed via computer. On one ward (Ward A), we placed signs outlining recommendations regarding responsible test-ordering. Ward B acted as a control. Data was collected during a 6-month study period to determine whether test-ordering practices differed.

RESULTS

A total of 1645 patients accounting for 17 786 patient-days were included in the study. Fewer tests were ordered on Ward A than Ward B (7.38 vs 8.20 tests/patient-day; P < 0.01). Additionally, significantly fewer patients on Ward B received ≥1 complete blood count/day (36.1% vs 42.5%, P = 0.04). This effect was most pronounced among patients admitted for 7-30 days.

CONCLUSION

The passive intervention of placing signs on clinicians' computers significantly reduced unnecessary testing.

摘要

背景

在发达国家,高达 30%的医疗支出是不必要的。不必要的检测不仅在经济上是浪费,而且可能对患者造成伤害。研究表明,教育、审核和限制医嘱等干预措施可以减少不必要的检测。然而,这些干预措施需要耗费大量的时间和资源。我们进行了一项研究,以确定在医生的电脑上放置标志这一被动干预措施是否能有效减少不必要的检测。

目的

确定在医生电脑上放置标志以限制不必要检测的效果。

方法

我们确定了两个急性医学病房,所有医嘱都通过电脑下达。在一个病房(A 病房),我们放置了标志,概述了有关负责任的检测医嘱的建议。B 病房作为对照。在为期 6 个月的研究期间收集数据,以确定检测医嘱的做法是否有所不同。

结果

共有 1645 名患者,共 17786 个患者日被纳入研究。A 病房的检测次数少于 B 病房(7.38 次与 8.20 次/患者日;P<0.01)。此外,B 病房有更多的患者每天接受≥1 次完整的血细胞计数(36.1%比 42.5%,P=0.04)。这种影响在住院 7-30 天的患者中最为明显。

结论

在医生电脑上放置标志这一被动干预措施显著减少了不必要的检测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验