对斯塔林和富夸（1987年）关于反刍和呕吐研究综述的评论。
Comment on Starin and Fuqua's (1987) review of research on rumination and vomiting.
作者信息
Mulick J A, Schroeder S R, Rojahn J
机构信息
Department of Pediatrics, Ohio State University, Children's Hospital, Columbus 43205.
出版信息
Res Dev Disabil. 1988;9(4):433-40. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(88)90036-4.
Starin and Fuqua seriously misread a critical study cited in their recent review in failing to characterize it as an experimental analysis of four treatment procedures, and therefore inappropriately criticized it for several shortcomings. This misreading and a tendency to equate vomiting with and without rumination compromise their conclusions regarding treatment choice. At the present time, the data base favors selection of several aversive procedures and the nonaversive satiation procedure over others, but the number of studies on nonaversive operant treatment procedures remains remarkably limited.
斯塔林和富卡严重误读了他们近期综述中引用的一项关键研究，未能将其定性为对四种治疗程序的实验分析，因此不适当地批评该研究存在若干缺陷。这种误读以及将有反刍和无反刍呕吐等同起来的倾向，损害了他们关于治疗选择的结论。目前，数据库支持选择几种厌恶程序和非厌恶饱足程序而非其他程序，但关于非厌恶操作性治疗程序的研究数量仍然非常有限。
Zotero 插件