Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Texas State University-San Marcos, Clinic for Autism Research Evaluation and Support, San Marcos, TX 78666, United States.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2193-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
We conducted a systematic analysis of studies that involved the treatment of rumination and operant vomiting in individuals with developmental disabilities. A total of 21 studies involving a combined 32 participants were identified and analyzed in terms of (a) participant characteristics, (b) dependent variables, (c) intervention procedures, (d) functional assessment procedures and results, (e) intervention outcomes, and (f) certainty of evidence. In comparison to previous reviews on rumination and operant vomiting, this review identified fewer studies involving punishment-based interventions and an increase in function-based reinforcement interventions. Preliminary guidelines for practitioners faced with assessing and treating these behaviors are offered and directions for future research are discussed.
我们对涉及治疗发育障碍个体的反刍和操作性呕吐的研究进行了系统分析。共确定了 21 项研究,涉及 32 名参与者,从以下几个方面进行了分析:(a)参与者特征,(b)因变量,(c)干预程序,(d)功能评估程序和结果,(e)干预结果,以及(f)证据的确定性。与之前关于反刍和操作性呕吐的综述相比,本综述发现基于惩罚的干预措施的研究较少,而基于功能的强化干预措施的研究有所增加。为面临评估和治疗这些行为的从业者提供了初步指南,并讨论了未来研究的方向。