• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[全科医生提供的初级姑息治疗:改善结构、法律和财务框架条件的策略制定]

[Primary palliative care provision by general practitioners: Development of strategies to improve structural, legal and financial framework conditions].

作者信息

Ewertowski Helen, Hesse Anja Katharina, Schneider Nils, Stiel Stephanie

机构信息

Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Dec;149:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2019.12.003
PMID:32059833
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

General practitioners (GPs) make a major contribution to outpatient palliative care (AAPV). In 2013, new fee rates for AAPV were included in the uniform assessment standard, which strengthens the financial framework conditions for outpatient palliative care by GPs. The aim of the ALLPRAX project is to improve the framework conditions for AAPV. This contribution focusses on ideas for changing structural, legal, and financial framework conditions for an optimised AAPV.

METHODS

In April 2018, 28 healthcare professionals (10 GPs, 3 medical assistants, 3 hospital doctors, and 12 representatives of the nursing professions) from hospice and palliative care providers in Lower Saxony were invited to participate in nine group discussions at Hannover Medical School. During these group discussions, inhibitory factors for AAPV and possible solutions were discussed. The analysis of the group discussions was carried out using a summarizing content analysis according to Mayring.

RESULTS

In order to optimise palliative care by GPs in Germany, it is proposed that a) additional palliative care specialists for care coordination and round-the-clock availability for patients and relatives in GP practices should be provided (structural solution), b) nursing staff should be permitted to prescribe aids (legal solution), and c) higher remuneration for medical consultations should be provided (financial solution). These approaches could increase feasibility in day-to-day practice and create incentives for caregivers to provide more high-quality general outpatient palliative care.

DISCUSSION

The described high expenditure in general outpatient palliative care, which is hardly inferior to specialised outpatient palliative care from the caregivers' point of view, is not reflected accordingly, neither structurally nor financially.

CONCLUSION

In order to optimise general outpatient palliative care, structural, legal and financial framework conditions need to be correspondingly adapted.

摘要

引言

全科医生(GP)对门诊姑息治疗(AAPV)做出了重大贡献。2013年,AAPV的新收费标准被纳入统一评估标准,这加强了全科医生门诊姑息治疗的财务框架条件。ALLPRAX项目的目的是改善AAPV的框架条件。本论文着重探讨优化AAPV的结构、法律和财务框架条件的思路。

方法

2018年4月,来自下萨克森州临终关怀和姑息治疗机构的28名医疗保健专业人员(10名全科医生、3名医疗助理、3名医院医生和12名护理专业代表)受邀参加在汉诺威医学院举行的9次小组讨论。在这些小组讨论中,探讨了AAPV的抑制因素和可能的解决方案。小组讨论的分析采用了根据迈林提出的总结性内容分析法。

结果

为了优化德国全科医生的姑息治疗,建议:a)应提供额外的姑息治疗专家,以协调护理工作,并为全科医生诊所的患者及其亲属提供全天候服务(结构解决方案);b)应允许护理人员开辅助器具处方(法律解决方案);c)应提高医疗咨询的报酬(财务解决方案)。这些方法可以增加日常实践中的可行性,并激励护理人员提供更高质量的全科门诊姑息治疗。

讨论

从护理人员的角度来看,全科门诊姑息治疗的高支出几乎不亚于专科门诊姑息治疗,但在结构和财务上都没有得到相应体现。

结论

为了优化全科门诊姑息治疗,结构、法律和财务框架条件需要相应调整。

相似文献

1
[Primary palliative care provision by general practitioners: Development of strategies to improve structural, legal and financial framework conditions].[全科医生提供的初级姑息治疗:改善结构、法律和财务框架条件的策略制定]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Dec;149:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
2
[End-of-life care in a rural small-town region in Lower Saxony: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis based on routinely collected general practice data].[下萨克森州一个乡村小镇地区的临终关怀:基于常规收集的全科医疗数据的回顾性横断面分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Feb;168:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.10.002. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
3
[Implementing an intermediate level of outpatient palliative care in Germany: Experiences and views of specialised outpatient palliative care teams].[在德国实施中级门诊姑息治疗:专业门诊姑息治疗团队的经验与观点]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Sep;173:64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
GPs' perspective on End-of-Life Care - an evaluation based on the German version of the General Practice End of Life Care Index.全科医生对临终关怀的看法 - 基于一般实践临终关怀指数德国版的评估。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Nov 16;18:Doc10. doi: 10.3205/000286. eCollection 2020.
5
Development of empirical recommendations for regional hospice and palliative care networks in Germany: A qualitative study.德国地区临终关怀与姑息治疗网络实证建议的制定:一项定性研究。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Mar;140:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
6
[Identification of regional hospice and palliative care networks in Germany - Results of a multi-method survey].[德国地区临终关怀与姑息治疗网络的识别——一项多方法调查的结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Dec;182-183:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
7
Improving primary palliative care - a Delphi consensus study on measures for general practice in Germany.提高初级姑息治疗水平 - 德国全科医学的德尔菲共识研究:措施。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jan 17;23(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01613-7.
8
Exploring the status of and demand for palliative day-care clinics and day hospices in Germany: a protocol for a mixed-methods study.探索德国姑息治疗日间护理诊所和日间收容所的现状和需求:一项混合方法研究的方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jun 24;20(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00792-5.
9
[General practitioners' palliative care activities in Westphalia-Lippe compared to other federal states - Secondary analysis of a survey].[与其他联邦州相比,威斯特法伦-利珀地区全科医生的姑息治疗活动——一项调查的二次分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Sep;181:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.12.006. Epub 2023 May 26.
10
[New legal regulations for palliative care with implications for politics and practice].[姑息治疗的新法律法规及其对政策与实践的影响]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Jan;60(1):4-10. doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2480-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Structured implementation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in general practice - A prospective interventional study with follow-up.在一般实践中结构化实施支持和姑息治疗指标工具 - 一项具有随访的前瞻性干预研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 1;21(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01107-y.
2
Quality of end-of-life care in general practice - a pre-post comparison of a two-tiered intervention.一般实践中的临终关怀质量 - 两级干预的前后比较。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Apr 20;23(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01689-9.
3
Improving primary palliative care - a Delphi consensus study on measures for general practice in Germany.
提高初级姑息治疗水平 - 德国全科医学的德尔菲共识研究:措施。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jan 17;23(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01613-7.
4
Effectiveness of two types of palliative home care in cancer and non-cancer patients: A retrospective population-based study using claims data.两种姑息性家庭护理在癌症和非癌症患者中的效果:一项基于人群的回顾性研究,使用索赔数据。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jun;35(6):1158-1169. doi: 10.1177/02692163211013666.
5
GPs' perspective on End-of-Life Care - an evaluation based on the German version of the General Practice End of Life Care Index.全科医生对临终关怀的看法 - 基于一般实践临终关怀指数德国版的评估。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Nov 16;18:Doc10. doi: 10.3205/000286. eCollection 2020.
6
Quality indicators for the evaluation of end-of-life care in Germany - a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of statutory health insurance data.德国评估终末期护理质量的指标 - 法定健康保险数据的回顾性横断面分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Dec 8;19(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00679-x.