Dorfman Allison L, Gauvin Mathieu, Vatcher Dylan, Little John M, Polomeno Robert C, Lachapelle Pierre
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Montreal Children's Hospital, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Boul. Décarie, Glen Site, Block E, Program Mail Drop Point #EM03211 - Office #EM03238, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Doc Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;141(2):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s10633-020-09755-2. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
To investigate the center-periphery distribution of ON and OFF retinal responses in complete congenital stationary night blindness (cCSNB).
Photopic full-field flash ERGs (photopic ffERGs) and OPs (photopic ffOPs) and slow m-sequence (to enhance OP prominence) mfERGs (and filtered mfOPs) evoked by a 37 hexagon stimulus array were recorded from normal subjects and cCSNB patients. Discrete wavelet transform (DWT) analysis of photopic ffERGs and mfERGs was also performed in order to assess the contribution of the ON and OFF retinal pathways (i.e., OFF-to-ON ratio) in both cohorts.
As expected, the photopic ffERG (and ffOPs) responses in cCSNB were devoid of the first two of the three OPs (i.e., OP2 and OP3 and OP4) normally seen on the ascending limb of the b-wave. A similar finding was also noted in the mfERGs (and mfOPs) of ring 4. In contrast, the mfERGs (and mfOPs) of ring 1 included all three OPs. DWT analysis revealed that while in normal subjects, the OFF-to-ON ratio of mfERGs slightly increased from rings 1 to 4 (from 0.61 ± 0.03 to 0.78 ± 0.04; p < 0.05; median: from 0.62 to 0.79; p < 0.05), in cCSNB this ratio increased significantly more [from 0.73 ± 0.13 (ring 1) to 1.18 ± 0.17 (ring 4); p < 0.05; median: 0.78 to 1.22; p < 0.05], hence from a normal ON-dominated ratio (central ring) to an OFF-dominated ratio (peripheral ring).
Our results show a clear discrepancy of ON and OFF mfOP components in cCSNB. Responses originating from the most central ring (i.e., ring 1) disclosed a near-normal electrophysiological contribution (as revealed with the presence of OP2, OP3 and OP4 as well as with the DWT OFF-to-ON ratio) of the retinal ON and OFF pathways in mfERG (and mfOPs) responses compared to responses from the more peripheral ring (and ffOP) which are devoid of the ON OPs (i.e., OP2 and OP3).
研究完全性先天性静止性夜盲(cCSNB)患者视网膜上开(ON)和关(OFF)反应的中心-周边分布情况。
记录正常受试者和cCSNB患者由37六边形刺激阵列诱发的明视全视野闪光视网膜电图(明视ffERG)和振荡电位(明视ffOP)以及慢m序列(以增强OP的显著性)多焦视网膜电图(mfERG)(和滤波后的mfOP)。还对明视ffERG和mfERG进行离散小波变换(DWT)分析,以评估两个队列中视网膜ON和OFF通路的贡献(即OFF与ON的比率)。
正如预期的那样,cCSNB患者的明视ffERG(和ffOP)反应在b波上升支上通常可见的三个OP中的前两个(即OP2、OP3和OP4)缺失。在第4环的mfERG(和mfOP)中也观察到类似的发现。相比之下,第1环的mfERG(和mfOP)包含所有三个OP。DWT分析显示,正常受试者中,mfERG的OFF与ON比率从第1环到第4环略有增加(从0.61±0.03增加到0.78±0.04;p<0.05;中位数:从0.62增加到0.79;p<0.05),而在cCSNB中,该比率增加得更为显著[从0.73±0.13(第1环)增加到1.18±0.17(第4环);p<0.05;中位数:从0.78增加到1.22;p<0.05],即从正常的以ON为主导的比率(中心环)变为以OFF为主导的比率(周边环)。
我们的结果显示cCSNB患者中ON和OFF mfOP成分存在明显差异。与来自更周边环(和ffOP)的反应相比,源自最中心环(即第1环)的反应在mfERG(和mfOP)反应中显示出视网膜ON和OFF通路接近正常的电生理贡献(如OP2、OP3和OP4的存在以及DWT OFF与ON比率所揭示的),而周边环的反应则缺乏ON OPs(即OP2和OP3)。