Suppr超能文献

自闭症谱系障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍中视网膜电图的离散小波变换分析

Discrete Wavelet Transform Analysis of the Electroretinogram in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

作者信息

Constable Paul A, Marmolejo-Ramos Fernando, Gauthier Mercedes, Lee Irene O, Skuse David H, Thompson Dorothy A

机构信息

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Centre for Change and Complexity in Learning, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2022 Jun 6;16:890461. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.890461. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the electroretinogram waveform in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using a discrete wavelet transform (DWT) approach.

METHODS

A total of 55 ASD, 15 ADHD and 156 control individuals took part in this study. Full field light-adapted electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded using a Troland protocol, accounting for pupil size, with five flash strengths ranging from -0.12 to 1.20 log photopic cd.s.m. A DWT analysis was performed using the Haar wavelet on the waveforms to examine the energy within the time windows of the a- and b-waves and the oscillatory potentials (OPs) which yielded six DWT coefficients related to these parameters. The central frequency bands were from 20-160 Hz relating to the a-wave, b-wave and OPs represented by the coefficients: a20, a40, b20, b40, op80, and op160, respectively. In addition, the b-wave amplitude and percentage energy contribution of the OPs (%OPs) in the total ERG broadband energy was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were significant group differences ( < 0.001) in the coefficients corresponding to energies in the b-wave (b20, b40) and OPs (op80 and op160) as well as the b-wave amplitude. Notable differences between the ADHD and control groups were found in the b20 and b40 coefficients. In contrast, the greatest differences between the ASD and control group were found in the op80 and op160 coefficients. The b-wave amplitude showed both ASD and ADHD significant group differences from the control participants, for flash strengths greater than 0.4 log photopic cd.s.m ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This methodological approach may provide insights about neuronal activity in studies investigating group differences where retinal signaling may be altered through neurodevelopment or neurodegenerative conditions. However, further work will be required to determine if retinal signal analysis can offer a classification model for neurodevelopmental conditions in which there is a co-occurrence such as ASD and ADHD.

摘要

背景

采用离散小波变换(DWT)方法评估自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者的视网膜电图波形。

方法

本研究共纳入55例ASD患者、15例ADHD患者和156例对照个体。采用特罗兰协议记录全视野光适应视网膜电图(ERG),该协议考虑了瞳孔大小,闪光强度范围为-0.12至1.20 log明视觉cd·s·m²,共五种。使用哈尔小波对波形进行DWT分析,以检查a波和b波以及振荡电位(OPs)时间窗内的能量,从而得出与这些参数相关的六个DWT系数。中心频率带为20 - 160 Hz,分别对应由系数a20、a40、b20、b40、op80和op160表示的a波、b波和OPs。此外,还评估了b波振幅以及OPs在总ERG宽带能量中的能量贡献百分比(%OPs)。

结果

在与b波(b20、b40)和OPs(op80和op160)能量对应的系数以及b波振幅方面,存在显著的组间差异(<0.001)。ADHD组与对照组之间在b20和b40系数上存在显著差异。相比之下,ASD组与对照组之间在op80和op160系数上差异最大。对于闪光强度大于0.4 log明视觉cd·s·m²的情况,b波振幅显示ASD组和ADHD组与对照参与者之间均存在显著的组间差异(<0.001)。

结论

这种方法学途径可能为研究中神经元活动提供见解,这些研究旨在调查视网膜信号可能因神经发育或神经退行性疾病而改变的组间差异。然而,还需要进一步的研究来确定视网膜信号分析是否能够为诸如ASD和ADHD等共病的神经发育疾病提供分类模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c19/9207322/d8cd6d1c9d71/fnins-16-890461-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验