Suppr超能文献

定义头颈部鳞状细胞癌中的安全手术骨切缘:术中细胞学评估与术前影像学检查相比对骨切缘的诊断影响。

Defining secure surgical bone margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: The diagnostic impact of intraoperative cytological assessment of bone resection margins compared with preoperative imaging.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81679 Munich, Germany.

Department of Radiology, Hospital rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81679 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2020 Mar;102:104579. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104579. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Imaging provides crucial staging information for treatment planning of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Despite technical progress in imaging techniques, defining the extent of bone involvement preoperatively remains challenging and requires intraoperative information to control for adequate resection. The intraoperative cytological assessment of the bone resection margins (ICAB) provides information whether bone is infiltrated by carcinoma. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of preoperative imaging compared with ICAB in order to achieve carcinoma-free bone margins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

108 HNSCC patients underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and orthopantomogram (OPG) for staging and surgical planning. Curative resection was planned based on imaging. Intraoperatively, the resection margins were controlled by ICAB. The diagnostic value of preoperative imaging and ICAB was assessed with reference to the histological findings.

RESULTS

CT showed a sensitivity of 89.7%, specificity of 63.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.9%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 70.8%. MRI revealed a sensitivity of 45.5%, specificity of 66.7%, PPV of 71.4% and NPV of 40.0%. OPG-imaging had a sensitivity of 64.7%, specificity of 76.2%, PPV of 81.5%, NPV 57.1%. In comparison, ICAB provided a sensitivity of 78.6%, specificity of 95.7%, PPV 73.3%, and NPV 96.7%. The accuracy was 82.1%, 52.9%, 69.0%, and 93.5% for CT, MRI, OPG, and ICAB, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative imaging lacks accuracy in defining adequate bone resection margins, compared with ICAB. ICAB supports preoperative imaging and intraoperative frozen sections to improve bone margin control.

摘要

背景

影像学为头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)的治疗计划提供了关键的分期信息。尽管影像学技术取得了技术进步,但术前定义骨受累的范围仍然具有挑战性,需要术中信息来控制充分的切除。骨切除边缘的术中细胞学评估(ICAB)提供了有关骨是否被癌浸润的信息。本研究旨在评估术前影像学与 ICAB 相比在获得无癌骨边缘方面的诊断价值。

材料和方法

108 例 HNSCC 患者接受了术前计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和全景片(OPG)进行分期和手术计划。根据影像学结果规划根治性切除术。术中通过 ICAB 控制切除边缘。参考组织学发现评估术前影像学和 ICAB 的诊断价值。

结果

CT 的灵敏度为 89.7%,特异性为 63.0%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 85.9%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 70.8%。MRI 的灵敏度为 45.5%,特异性为 66.7%,PPV 为 71.4%,NPV 为 40.0%。OPG 成像的灵敏度为 64.7%,特异性为 76.2%,PPV 为 81.5%,NPV 为 57.1%。相比之下,ICAB 的灵敏度为 78.6%,特异性为 95.7%,PPV 为 73.3%,NPV 为 96.7%。CT、MRI、OPG 和 ICAB 的准确性分别为 82.1%、52.9%、69.0%和 93.5%。

结论

与 ICAB 相比,术前影像学在定义充分的骨切除边缘方面准确性不足。ICAB 支持术前影像学和术中冷冻切片,以提高骨边缘控制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验