Suppr超能文献

不同充填技术充填椭圆形根管后牙胶、封闭剂及充填体所占百分比:共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究

Percentage of Gutta-Percha-, Sealer-, and Void-Filled Areas in Oval-Shaped Root Canals Obturated with Different Filling Techniques: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.

作者信息

Hirai Vinicio Hidemitsu Goto, Machado Ricardo, Budziak Maria Carolina Lucato, Piasecki Lucila, Kowalczuck Alexandre, Neto Ulisses Xavier da Silva

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, School of Health and Bioscience, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Clinical Practice Limited to Endodontics, Navegantes, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2020 Feb;14(1):8-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701543. Epub 2020 Feb 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compared different obturation techniques, analyzing percentage of areas filled with gutta-percha, sealer, and voids (PGFA, PSFA, and PVFA, respectively) in oval-shaped root canals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 extracted human mandibular central incisors were decoronated, instrumented, and irrigated using the same protocol. After drying, the root canal was filled with AH Plus labeled with 0.1% rhodamine B dye using a Lentulo spiral. The filling procedure was performed by dividing the teeth into four groups according to the respective technique: G1, cold lateral condensation; G2, continuous wave of condensation; G3, modified cold lateral condensation using an F3 master cone; and G4, modified continuous wave of condensation using an ISO (International Organization for Standardization) sized 30 gutta-percha cone. Then, slices measuring 1.5 mm in thickness were obtained 3 and 6 mm from the apex and evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscopy to determine PGFA, PSFA, and PVFA.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The data were analyzed statistically with analysis of variance and Games-Howell's tests ( = 0.05).

RESULTS

The groups showed no significant differences in the apical third (3 mm from the apex). In the middle third (6 mm from the apex), G3 and G1 showed higher PGFA and PVFA, respectively. G3 showed lower PSFA than G2 and G4. Both cold techniques (G1 and G3) promoted lower PSFA than both warm techniques (G2 and G4).

CONCLUSIONS

Notwithstanding the limitations of this study, PGFA, PSFA, and PVFA ranged significantly only in the middle third, as observed by the different filling techniques. Higher PGFA and PVFA values were obtained for G3 and G1, respectively. Both cold techniques promoted lower PSFA than both warm techniques.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了不同的根管充填技术,分析椭圆形根管中牙胶、封闭剂和空隙(分别为PGFA、PSFA和PVFA)所占面积的百分比。

材料与方法

总共60颗拔除的人下颌中切牙经去冠、预备和冲洗,采用相同方案。干燥后,使用Lentulo螺旋输送器将标记有0.1%罗丹明B染料的AH Plus充填到根管中。根据各自的技术将牙齿分为四组进行充填操作:G1组,冷侧向加压充填;G2组,连续波热压充填;G3组,使用F3主尖锉的改良冷侧向加压充填;G4组,使用国际标准化组织(ISO)30号牙胶尖的改良连续波热压充填。然后,从根尖3 mm和6 mm处获取厚度为1.5 mm的切片,通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜进行评估,以确定PGFA、PSFA和PVFA。

统计分析

采用方差分析和Games-Howell检验对数据进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。

结果

各组在根尖三分之一处(距根尖3 mm)无显著差异。在中间三分之一处(距根尖6 mm),G3组和G1组分别显示出较高的PGFA和PVFA。G3组的PSFA低于G2组和G4组。两种冷技术(G1组和G3组)的PSFA均低于两种热技术(G2组和G4组)。

结论

尽管本研究存在局限性,但不同充填技术观察到,PGFA、PSFA和PVFA仅在中间三分之一处有显著差异。G3组和G1组分别获得了较高的PGFA和PVFA值。两种冷技术的PSFA均低于两种热技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d5b/7069748/8bb09c05a37a/10-1055-s-0040-1701543_00296_01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验