Suppr超能文献

比较 Reciproc Blue 或 Hyflex EDM 锉在 3D 打印 C 形根管内使用连续波和冷侧方加压技术充填的效果。

Comparison of continuous wave and cold lateral condensation filling techniques in 3D printed simulated C-shape canals instrumented with Reciproc Blue or Hyflex EDM.

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentsity, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 21;14(11):e0224793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224793. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the efficiency of continuous wave obturation and cold lateral condensation techniques and filling time in C-shape canals of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed resin teeth shaped with Reciproc Blue (VDW) or Hyflex EDM (Coltene/Whaledent).

METHODOLOGY

One tooth with C1-type orifice and root canal morphology and one with C2-type orifice and C2-C3 root canal morphology were selected based on CBCT. Two replicas of selected teeth were manufactured with a 3D-printer and their canals were instrumented with Reciproc Blue or Hyflex EDM. These 4 instrumented replicas were scanned with CBCT. Identical 10 replicas of each group (total of 40) were produced using a 3D-printer and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 5), root filled with either continuous wave obturation (CW) or cold lateral condensation (LC). Horizontal cross-sections of C1-type were made at 2, 4, 6, 8 mm and C2-type at 2, 4, 6 mm from the apical foramen. Gutta-percha, sealer and void areas were evaluated with image analysis sofware. Data were analysed using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney-U tests and the Factorial ANOVA was used for interaction effects. Time required to fill canals was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

For C1-type, LC had more gutta-percha and less sealer compared to CW in 2-mm sections (p<0.05). CW had greater percentages of gutta-percha and lower percentages of sealer compared with LC group in 4, 6, 8 mm sections and total area (p<0.05). LC group had higher percentages of voids compared to CW group in 2 and 4 mm sections (p<0.05). For C2-type, CW had more gutta-percha and less sealer versus LC group in all sections and total area (p<0.05). LC had the least gutta-percha and greatest sealer percentages at 6-mm sections (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the percentages of voids at any level of sections between the filling techniques (p>0.05). In both C-types, there was no significant difference in the percentages of gutta-percha, sealer and voids between Reciproc Blue and Hyflex EDM-shaped groups at any level (p>0.05). Time spent for the LC technique and filling C1-type was significantly longer than when using the CW technique and filling C2-type (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous wave obturation was more effective than lateral condensation in both C1- and C2-type, except for the apical 2 mm section of C1-type, suggesting the need for a modified CW technique.

摘要

目的

比较连续波根管充填技术和冷侧方加压技术在 3D 打印 Reciproc Blue(VDW)或 Hyflex EDM(Coltene/Whaledent)树脂牙 C 形根管中的效率和充填时间。

方法

根据 CBCT 选择具有 C1 型口和根管形态的一颗牙和具有 C2 型口和 C2-C3 根管形态的一颗牙。用 3D 打印机制作两颗所选牙齿的复制品,并使用 Reciproc Blue 或 Hyflex EDM 对其根管进行仪器化。用 CBCT 对这 4 个仪器化的复制品进行扫描。使用 3D 打印机制作每组(共 40 个)各 10 个复制品,并随机分为 2 组(n = 5),分别用连续波根管充填(CW)或冷侧方加压(LC)根充。在距根尖孔 2、4、6、8mm 处制作 C1 型的水平横断面,在距根尖孔 2、4、6mm 处制作 C2 型的水平横断面。使用图像分析软件评估牙胶、密封剂和空隙区域。使用非参数 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney-U 检验分析数据,并使用析因方差分析交互效应。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验评估根管充填所需的时间。

结果

对于 C1 型,在 2mm 切片中,LC 组的牙胶多于 CW 组,而密封剂少于 CW 组(p<0.05)。在 4、6、8mm 切片和总面积中,CW 组的牙胶百分比高于 LC 组,而密封剂百分比低于 LC 组(p<0.05)。LC 组在 2mm 和 4mm 切片中的空隙百分比高于 CW 组(p<0.05)。对于 C2 型,CW 组在所有切片和总面积中的牙胶多于 LC 组,而密封剂少于 LC 组(p<0.05)。在 6mm 切片中,LC 组的牙胶百分比最低,而密封剂百分比最高(p<0.05)。两种充填技术在各切片水平的空隙百分比均无统计学差异(p>0.05)。在两种 C 型中,在任何切片水平,Reciproc Blue 和 Hyflex EDM 成形组之间的牙胶、密封剂和空隙百分比均无统计学差异(p>0.05)。LC 技术的时间和 C1 型的充填时间明显长于 CW 技术和 C2 型的充填时间(p<0.05)。

结论

连续波根管充填技术在 C1 型和 C2 型中均比冷侧方加压技术更有效,除了 C1 型根尖 2mm 切片外,这表明需要改进连续波根管充填技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验