Suppr超能文献

术前 MDCT 对穿透性腹部和骨盆创伤患者的准确性。

Accuracy of Preoperative MDCT in Patients With Penetrating Abdominal and Pelvic Trauma.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020 May;71(2):231-237. doi: 10.1177/0846537119888375. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the overall diagnostic accuracy of preoperative multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in penetrating abdominal and pelvic injuries (PAPI).

METHOD AND MATERIALS

We used our hospitals' trauma registry to retrospectively identify patients with PAPI from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2016. Only patients who had a 64-MDCT scan at presentation and subsequently underwent laparotomy or laparoscopy were included in our study cohort. Each finding noted on MDCT was rated using a 5-point scale to indicate certainty of injury, with a score of 0 being definitive. Using surgical findings as the gold standard, the accuracy of radiology reports was analyzed in 2 ways. A κ statistic was calculated to evaluate each pair of values for absolute agreement, and ratings for all organ systems were analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine whether radiology and surgical findings were similar enough to be clinically meaningful. Qualitative review of the radiology and surgical reports focused on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract was conducted.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 38 males and 4 females with a median age of 29 years and a median injury severity score of 15.6. For this study, 12 different organ groups were categorized and analyzed. Of those organ groups, absolute agreement between MDCT and surgical findings was found only for liver and spleen (κ values ranging from 0.2 to 0.5). Additionally, the ANOVA revealed an interaction between finding type and organ system ( = 7.4, < .001). The most clinically significant discrepancies between MDCT and surgical findings were for gallbladder, bowel, mesenteric, and diaphragmatic injuries. Qualitative review of the GI tract revealed that radiologists can detect significant findings such as presence of injury, however, localization and extent of injury pose a challenge.

CONCLUSION

The detection of clinically significant injuries to solid organs in trauma patients with PAPI on 64-MDCT is adequate. However, detection of injury to the remaining organ groups on MDCT, especially bowel, mesentery, and diaphragm, remains a challenge.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估术前多层螺旋 CT(MDCT)在穿透性腹部和骨盆损伤(PAPI)中的整体诊断准确性。

方法与材料

我们使用医院的创伤登记处,从 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日,回顾性地确定了患有 PAPI 的患者。仅纳入在就诊时接受了 64-MDCT 扫描,随后接受剖腹手术或腹腔镜检查的患者作为研究队列。使用 5 分制对 MDCT 上记录的每个发现进行评分,以表示损伤的确定性,0 分为确定性。以手术结果为金标准,分析了 2 种放射学报告的准确性。计算κ统计量以评估每对绝对一致的值,并使用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)分析所有器官系统的评分,以确定放射学和手术结果是否足够相似以具有临床意义。对放射学和手术报告中胃肠道(GI)系统的定性回顾进行了分析。

结果

本队列包括 38 名男性和 4 名女性,中位年龄为 29 岁,损伤严重程度评分中位数为 15.6。在这项研究中,将 12 个不同的器官组进行了分类和分析。在这些器官组中,仅在肝和脾的 MDCT 和手术发现之间发现了绝对一致(κ 值范围为 0.2 至 0.5)。此外,ANOVA 显示发现类型和器官系统之间存在交互作用( = 7.4, <.001)。MDCT 和手术发现之间最具临床意义的差异是胆囊、肠、肠系膜和横膈损伤。对 GI 道的定性回顾表明,放射科医生可以检测到明显的损伤,例如损伤的存在,但是,损伤的定位和程度存在挑战。

结论

在 PAPI 创伤患者的 64-MDCT 上,可以检测到实质性器官的临床显著损伤。然而,在 MDCT 上检测到剩余器官组(尤其是肠、肠系膜和横膈)的损伤仍然是一个挑战。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验