Landry Bret A, Patlas Michael N, Faidi Samir, Coates Angela, Nicolaou Savvas
Division of Emergency/Trauma Radiology, Department of Radiology, Michael DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Emergency/Trauma Radiology, Department of Radiology, Michael DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2016 Nov;67(4):420-425. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2015.11.006. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
Traumatic bowel and mesenteric injury (TBMI), although an uncommon entity, can be lethal if not detected and treated in a timely manner. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for the detection of TBMI in patients at our level 1 trauma centre.
We used our hospital's trauma registry to identify patients with a diagnosis of TBMI from January 1, 2006, to June 30, 2013. Only patients who had a 64-slice MDCT scan at presentation and subsequently underwent laparotomy or laparoscopy were included in the study cohort. Using the surgical findings as the gold standard, the accuracy of prospective radiology reports was analyzed.
Of the 4781 trauma patients who presented to our institution, 44 (0.92%) had surgically proven TBMI. Twenty-two of 44 were excluded as they did not have MDCT before surgery. The study cohort consisted of 14 males and 8 females with a median age of 41.5 years and a median injury severity score of 27. In total 17 of 22 had blunt trauma and 5 of 22 had penetrating injury. A correct preoperative imaging diagnosis of TBMI was made in 14 of 22 of patients. The overall sensitivity of the radiology reports was 63.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41%-82%), specificity was 79.6% (95% CI: 67%-89%), PPV was 53.9% (95% CI: 33%-73%), and the NPV was 85.5% (95% CI: 73%-94%). Accuracy was calculated at 75.3%. However, only 59% (10 of 17) of patients with blunt injury had a correct preoperative diagnosis. Review of the findings demonstrated that majority of patients with missed blunt TBMI (5 of 7) demonstrated only indirect signs of injury.
The detection of TBMI in trauma patients on 64-slice MDCT can be improved, especially in patients presenting with blunt injury. Missed cases in this population occurred because the possibility of TBMI was not considered despite the presence of indirect imaging signs. The prospective diagnosis of TBMI remains challenging despite advances in CT technology and widespread use of 64-slice MDCT.
创伤性肠及肠系膜损伤(TBMI)虽不常见,但如未及时发现和治疗可致命。本研究旨在评估我院一级创伤中心64层螺旋CT(MDCT)检测TBMI的诊断准确性。
利用我院创伤登记系统,筛选出2006年1月1日至2013年6月30日诊断为TBMI的患者。研究队列仅纳入就诊时接受64层MDCT扫描且随后接受剖腹手术或腹腔镜检查的患者。以前瞻性放射学报告的准确性以手术结果作为金标准进行分析。
我院收治的4781例创伤患者中,44例(0.92%)经手术证实为TBMI。44例中有22例因术前未行MDCT检查被排除。研究队列包括14例男性和8例女性,中位年龄41.5岁,中位损伤严重程度评分为27分。22例中17例为钝性伤,5例为穿透伤。22例患者中有14例术前影像学诊断TBMI正确。放射学报告的总体敏感性为63.6%(95%置信区间[CI]:41%-82%),特异性为79.6%(95%CI:67%-89%),阳性预测值为53.9%(95%CI:33%-73%),阴性预测值为85.5%(95%CI:73%-94%)。计算得出准确性为75.3%。然而,钝性伤患者中仅59%(17例中的10例)术前诊断正确。对结果的回顾表明,大多数漏诊钝性TBMI的患者(7例中的5例)仅表现出间接损伤征象。
64层MDCT对创伤患者TBMI的检测仍可改进,尤其是钝性伤患者。该人群中出现漏诊病例是因为尽管存在间接影像学征象,但未考虑TBMI的可能性。尽管CT技术取得进展且64层MDCT广泛应用,但TBMI的前瞻性诊断仍具有挑战性。