Precision Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boston, MA, USA.
Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
J Med Econ. 2020 Jun;23(6):581-592. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1730123. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
To evaluate total costs and health consequences of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program with colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), and expanded use of multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) from the perspectives of Integrated Delivery Networks (IDNs) and payers in the United States. We developed a budget impact and cost-consequence model that simulates CRC screening for eligible 50- to 75-year-old adults. A status quo scenario and an increased mt-sDNA scenario were modeled. The status quo includes the current screening mix of colonoscopy (83%), FIT (11%), and mt-sDNA (6%) modalities. The increased mt-sDNA scenario increases mt-sDNA utilization to 28% over 10 years. Costs for both the IDN and the payer perspectives incorporated diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopies, adverse events (AEs), and CRC treatment. The IDN perspective included screening program costs, composed of direct nonmedical (e.g. patient navigation) and indirect (e.g. administration) costs. It was assumed that IDNs do not incur the costs for stool-based screening tests or bowel preparation for colonoscopies. In a population of one million covered lives, the 10-year incremental cost savings incurred by increasing mt-sDNA utilization was $16.2 M for the IDN and $3.3 M for the payer. The incremental savings per-person-per-month were $0.14 and $0.03 for the IDN and payer, respectively. For both perspectives, increased diagnostic colonoscopy costs were offset by reductions in screening colonoscopies, surveillance colonoscopies, and AEs. Extending screening eligibility to 45- to 75-year-olds slightly decreased the overall cost savings. The natural history of CRC was not simulated; however, many of the utilized parameters were extracted from highly vetted natural history models or published literature. Direct nonmedical and indirect costs for CRC screening programs are applied on a per-person-per modality basis, whereas in reality some of these costs may be fixed. Increased mt-sDNA utilization leads to fewer colonoscopies, less AEs, and lower overall costs for both IDNs and payers, reducing overall screening program costs and increasing the number of cancers detected while maintaining screening adherence rates over 10 years.
从美国综合交付网络(IDN)和支付方的角度评估基于结肠镜、粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)和扩大应用多靶点粪便 DNA(mt-sDNA)的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查方案的总成本和健康后果。我们开发了一种预算影响和成本效益模型,模拟了适合 50 至 75 岁成年人的 CRC 筛查。模拟了现状情景和增加 mt-sDNA 情景。现状包括目前的筛查组合,即结肠镜(83%)、FIT(11%)和 mt-sDNA(6%)方式。在 10 年内,增加 mt-sDNA 的使用量增加到 28%。IDN 和支付方视角的成本包括诊断和监测结肠镜检查、不良事件(AE)和 CRC 治疗。IDN 视角包括筛查计划成本,由直接非医疗(如患者导航)和间接(如行政)成本组成。假设 IDN 不承担基于粪便的筛查测试或结肠镜检查的肠道准备成本。在覆盖 100 万人口的人群中,增加 mt-sDNA 使用率 10 年的增量成本节省为 IDN 节省 1620 万美元,为支付方节省 330 万美元。IDN 和支付方每人每月的增量节省分别为 0.14 美元和 0.03 美元。对于这两个视角,增加诊断结肠镜检查的成本被筛查结肠镜检查、监测结肠镜检查和 AE 的减少所抵消。将筛查资格扩大到 45 至 75 岁略微降低了整体成本节省。CRC 的自然史未被模拟;然而,许多使用的参数是从经过高度审查的自然史模型或已发表的文献中提取的。CRC 筛查计划的直接非医疗和间接成本是按每人每模式计算的,而实际上,其中一些成本可能是固定的。增加 mt-sDNA 的使用率会导致结肠镜检查次数减少、AE 减少,以及 IDN 和支付方的总体成本降低,从而降低整体筛查计划成本,并在 10 年内增加检测到的癌症数量,同时保持筛查依从率。