• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国一个自我投保的雇主人群中,增加多靶点粪便DNA检测在结直肠癌筛查者中的使用所产生的影响。

The impact of increasing multitarget stool DNA use among colorectal cancer screeners in a self-insured US employer population.

作者信息

Hathway Joanne M, Miller-Wilson Lesley-Ann, Sharma Abhishek, Jensen Ivar S, Yao Weiyu, Raza Sajjad, Parks Philip D, Weinstein Milton C

机构信息

PRECISIONheor, Precision Value & Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2021 Sep 1;9(1):1948670. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2021.1948670. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1080/20016689.2021.1948670
PMID:34512929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8425769/
Abstract

In the United States (US), colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. With the majority of the US population covered by employer-based health plans, employers can play a critical role in increasing CRC screening adherence, which may help avert CRC-related deaths. Therefore, it is important for self-insured employers to consider the impact of appropriate utilization of CRC screening options. To evaluate the impact of increasing multitarget stool DNA [mt-sDNA (Cologuard®)] use among CRC screeners from the perspective of a US self-insured employer. A 5-year Markov model was developed to quantify the budget impact of increasing mt-sDNA from 6% to 15% among average-risk screeners using colonoscopy, fecal immunological test, and mt-sDNA. Data on direct medical costs were obtained from published literature, Medicare CPT codes, and the Healthcare cost and Utilization project. Indirect costs included productivity loss due to workplace absenteeism for CRC screening and treatment. With a hypothetical population of 100,000 employees with screeners aged 50-64 years, compared to status quo, increased mt-sDNA utilization resulted in no differences in the numbers of cancers detected and the overall direct and indirect cost savings were ~$214,000 ($0.04 per-employee-per-month) over 5 years. Most of the savings were due to a reduction in the direct medical expenditure related to CRC screening, adverse events, and productivity loss due to colonoscopy screening. Similar results were observed in the model simulation among screeners aged 45-64 years. Increased utilization of mt-sDNA for CRC screening averts direct and indirect medical costs from a self-insured US employer perspective.

摘要

在美国,结直肠癌(CRC)是癌症相关死亡的第二大主要原因。由于美国大多数人口都参加了雇主提供的健康保险计划,雇主在提高CRC筛查依从性方面可以发挥关键作用,这可能有助于避免与CRC相关的死亡。因此,对于自保雇主来说,考虑适当使用CRC筛查选项的影响非常重要。从美国自保雇主的角度评估增加多靶点粪便DNA [mt-sDNA(Cologuard®)] 在CRC筛查者中的使用所产生的影响。开发了一个5年马尔可夫模型,以量化在使用结肠镜检查、粪便免疫检测和mt-sDNA的平均风险筛查者中,将mt-sDNA的使用比例从6%提高到15%所产生的预算影响。直接医疗成本数据来自已发表的文献、医疗保险CPT代码以及医疗成本和利用项目。间接成本包括因CRC筛查和治疗而导致的工作场所缺勤造成的生产力损失。假设有10万名年龄在50 - 64岁的员工接受筛查,与现状相比,增加mt-sDNA的使用在检测到的癌症数量上没有差异,并且在5年期间总体直接和间接成本节省约为21.4万美元(每人每月0.04美元)。大部分节省是由于与CRC筛查、不良事件以及结肠镜检查筛查导致的生产力损失相关的直接医疗支出减少。在45 - 64岁筛查者的模型模拟中也观察到了类似结果。从美国自保雇主的角度来看,增加mt-sDNA用于CRC筛查可避免直接和间接医疗成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab16/8425769/8630634e5fb1/ZJMA_A_1948670_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab16/8425769/8630634e5fb1/ZJMA_A_1948670_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab16/8425769/8630634e5fb1/ZJMA_A_1948670_F0001_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of increasing multitarget stool DNA use among colorectal cancer screeners in a self-insured US employer population.在美国一个自我投保的雇主人群中,增加多靶点粪便DNA检测在结直肠癌筛查者中的使用所产生的影响。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2021 Sep 1;9(1):1948670. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2021.1948670. eCollection 2021.
2
Projecting total costs and health consequences of increasing mt-sDNA utilization for colorectal cancer screening from the payer and integrated delivery network perspectives.从支付方和综合交付网络角度预测增加 mt-sDNA 在结直肠癌筛查中的应用的总费用和健康后果。
J Med Econ. 2020 Jun;23(6):581-592. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1730123. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
3
Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.分析两种用于筛查普通风险成年人结直肠癌的非侵入性粪便检测的有效性。
Public Health. 2020 May;182:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.01.021. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
Healthcare costs, resource utilization, and productivity loss associated with colorectal cancer screening.与结直肠癌筛查相关的医疗保健成本、资源利用和生产力损失。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(7):843-852. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2220965. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
5
The health economic impact of varying levels of adherence to colorectal screening on providers and payers.不同程度的结直肠癌筛查依从性对提供者和支付者的健康经济影响。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):69-78. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1858607.
6
Screening for Colorectal Cancer Using a Multitarget Stool DNA Test: Modeling the Effect of the Intertest Interval on Clinical Effectiveness.使用多靶点粪便DNA检测筛查结直肠癌:模拟检测间隔对临床有效性的影响
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016 Sep;15(3):e65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
7
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测筛查结直肠肿瘤的有效性和成本效益比较。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):427-439.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
8
Evaluating Outreach Methods for Multi-Target Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among an Employer Population.评估针对雇主人群的结直肠癌筛查多靶点粪便 DNA 检测的外展方法。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211037892. doi: 10.1177/21501327211037892.
9
Alaska Native Patient and Provider Perspectives on the Multitarget Stool DNA Test Compared With Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.阿拉斯加原住民患者和医疗服务提供者对多靶点粪便DNA检测与结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查的看法。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719884295. doi: 10.1177/2150132719884295.
10
Multitarget stool DNA for colorectal cancer screening: A review and commentary on the United States Preventive Services Draft Guidelines.用于结直肠癌筛查的多靶点粪便DNA检测:对美国预防服务工作组草案指南的综述与评论
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 May 15;8(5):450-8. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i5.450.

本文引用的文献

1
Projecting total costs and health consequences of increasing mt-sDNA utilization for colorectal cancer screening from the payer and integrated delivery network perspectives.从支付方和综合交付网络角度预测增加 mt-sDNA 在结直肠癌筛查中的应用的总费用和健康后果。
J Med Econ. 2020 Jun;23(6):581-592. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1730123. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
2
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Improving on-time colorectal cancer screening through lead time messaging.
通过提前告知信息来提高结直肠癌筛查的及时性。
Cancer. 2020 Jan 15;126(2):247-252. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32535. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
4
Health Benefits In 2019: Premiums Inch Higher, Employers Respond To Federal Policy.2019 年的健康福利:保费略有上升,雇主对联邦政策做出回应。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Oct;38(10):1752-1761. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01026. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
5
National and State Estimates of Lost Earnings From Cancer Deaths in the United States.美国癌症死亡导致的收入损失的全国及各州估计数。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;5(9):e191460. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1460. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
6
Real-world comparison of the effectiveness and safety of different bowel preparation agents.不同肠道准备药物有效性和安全性的真实世界比较。
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug 16;11:289-299. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S171861. eCollection 2018.
7
Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.美国癌症协会 2018 年普通风险成年人结直肠癌筛查指南更新
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):250-281. doi: 10.3322/caac.21457. Epub 2018 May 30.
8
Colorectal cancer screening in the United States: Trends from 2008 to 2015 and variation by health insurance coverage.美国的结直肠癌筛查:2008 年至 2015 年的趋势及医保覆盖情况的差异。
Prev Med. 2018 Jul;112:199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 3.
9
Employment benefits and job retention: evidence among patients with colorectal cancer.就业福利和工作保留:结直肠癌患者的证据。
Cancer Med. 2018 Mar;7(3):736-745. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1371. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
10
Comparison of claims data on hospitalization rates and repeat procedures in patients receiving a bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.接受结肠镜检查前肠道准备的患者住院率和重复手术的索赔数据比较。
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Aug 31;5:2050312117727999. doi: 10.1177/2050312117727999. eCollection 2017.