• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宗教机构在灾害风险管理中的作用:一项系统综述。

Role of Religious Institutions in Disaster Risk Management: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Sheikhi Rahim Ali, Seyedin Hesam, Qanizadeh Ghader, Jahangiri Katayoun

机构信息

Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Health Management and Economic Research Center, Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Apr;15(2):239-254. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.145. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1017/dmp.2019.145
PMID:32063259
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the relevant research on religious organizations' participation in disasters risk management and to understand the ways in which these organizations impact on disaster management. Today, community-based disaster risk management is emphasized as a very effective approach. Religious organizations are one of the most important components of community. They have access to resources that can be critical to help government agencies to manage disasters successfully.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted since August 2018 to investigate the role of religious institutions in disasters management and was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, Proquest, Embase, and Google scholar were the primary databases used for search of literature. Keywords used in this review were "religious institution," "disaster management," and their equivalents were obtained from Mesh, Emtree, or extracted from related articles. The papers from a broad range of disciplines related to keywords were included, and those articles that focus on response to disaster based on religious beliefs' and religion rather than participation of religious institutions in disaster risk management were excluded. From the 18,071 records identified through database searching in the early stage, 22 articles were selected for this review followed by analysis of the characteristics and content analysis of the included studies to answer the study questions.

RESULTS

The findings of this systematic review that emerged from content analysis are summarized in 11 themes: religious institutions' potential for disaster management, preparedness of religious institutions for disasters, response, recovery, the social capital, partnership with all stakeholders, collaboration and communication between mental health professionals and faith-based organization leaders, unity of information and message, religious institution shelters, dealing with disaster in old and new approaches, and barriers and challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Religious institutions have a vital role and great potential in disasters management. They often contribute in response and recovery phases of disasters, although these services are valuable but the great potential of these groups should also be recruited to participate in preparedness and mitigation efforts as part of disasters cycle. Coordination and collaboration of all stakeholders is essential in this way.

摘要

目标

本系统评价的目的是分析宗教组织参与灾害风险管理的相关研究,并了解这些组织对灾害管理的影响方式。如今,基于社区的灾害风险管理被视为一种非常有效的方法。宗教组织是社区最重要的组成部分之一。它们能够获取对帮助政府机构成功管理灾害至关重要的资源。

方法

本系统评价自2018年8月起开展,旨在调查宗教机构在灾害管理中的作用,并按照系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。PubMed、科学网(WOS)、Scopus、ProQuest、Embase和谷歌学术是用于文献检索的主要数据库。本评价使用的关键词为“宗教机构”“灾害管理”,其同义词从医学主题词表(Mesh)、Emtree中获取,或从相关文章中提取。纳入了与关键词相关的广泛学科的论文,排除了那些基于宗教信仰和宗教应对灾害而非宗教机构参与灾害风险管理的文章。从早期数据库检索识别出的18071条记录中,选取了22篇文章进行本评价,随后对纳入研究的特征进行分析并进行内容分析,以回答研究问题。

结果

通过内容分析得出的本系统评价结果归纳为11个主题:宗教机构的灾害管理潜力、宗教机构的灾害准备、应对、恢复、社会资本、与所有利益相关者的伙伴关系、心理健康专业人员与基于信仰的组织领导者之间的合作与沟通、信息与信息的统一、宗教机构避难所、新旧方法应对灾害、障碍与挑战。

结论

宗教机构在灾害管理中具有至关重要的作用和巨大潜力。它们通常在灾害的应对和恢复阶段发挥作用,尽管这些服务很有价值,但这些群体的巨大潜力也应被调动起来,作为灾害周期的一部分参与到备灾和减灾工作中。通过这种方式,所有利益相关者的协调与合作至关重要。

相似文献

1
Role of Religious Institutions in Disaster Risk Management: A Systematic Review.宗教机构在灾害风险管理中的作用:一项系统综述。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Apr;15(2):239-254. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.145. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Health Care Organizations' Interoperability during Multi-Organizational Disaster Management: A Scoping Review.医疗保健组织在多组织灾害管理中的互操作性:范围综述。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Jun;37(3):401-408. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000516. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Process and components of disaster risk communication in health systems: A thematic analysis.卫生系统中灾害风险沟通的过程与组成部分:一项主题分析
Jamba. 2022 Dec 8;14(1):1367. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1367. eCollection 2022.
6
Bridging science and spirituality: the intersection of religion and public health in the COVID-19 pandemic.架起科学与灵性的桥梁:新冠疫情中宗教与公共卫生的交叉点
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 19;14:1183234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1183234. eCollection 2023.
7
Applied distance learning methods in disaster preparedness: A systematic review.灾害准备中应用的远程学习方法:一项系统综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jan 22;12:447. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1721_22. eCollection 2023.
8
The General Public's Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Resource Management, Collaboration, and Community Assistance Centers During Disasters.公众对灾难期间资源管理、协作及社区援助中心的态度和信念。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Aug;12(4):446-449. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.108. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
9
Models and components in disaster risk communication: A systematic literature review.灾害风险沟通中的模型与组件:一项系统文献综述
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Mar 31;12:87. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_277_22. eCollection 2023.
10
Systematic review on the current state of disaster preparation Simulation Exercises (SimEx).灾难准备模拟演习(SimEx)现状的系统评价。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 May 24;23(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00824-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges of community participation in health emergency and disaster risk management in an Iranian context: a qualitative study.伊朗背景下社区参与卫生应急和灾害风险管理的挑战:一项定性研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 28;13:1460421. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1460421. eCollection 2025.
2
Looting and antisocial behavior after disasters: a systematic review.灾难后的抢劫及反社会行为:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21285-7.
3
Perceived Effectiveness of Public Health Unit Partnerships With Faith-Based and Other Community-Based Organizations to Promote COVID-19 Vaccination Among Ethnoracial Communities.
公共卫生部门与基于信仰和其他社区组织建立伙伴关系以促进种族社区新冠疫苗接种的感知有效性。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Nov 12;69:1607200. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607200. eCollection 2024.
4
'I can feel sad about it and I can worry, but inside I know everything happens for a reason': personal experiences in the aftermath of the March 15 Christchurch mosque attacks.“我会为此感到悲伤,也会担忧,但内心深处我明白一切事出有因”:克赖斯特彻奇清真寺3·15袭击事件后的个人经历
BJPsych Open. 2024 Oct 11;10(6):e176. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.791.
5
Awareness and use of support services following mass violence incidents.大规模暴力事件后的支持服务的认知与使用。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Dec;180:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
6
Exploring Faith Leaders' Experiences in Supporting Individuals with Mental Health Challenges in Ottawa, Canada.探索加拿大渥太华的信仰领袖在支持心理健康挑战个体方面的经验。
J Relig Health. 2024 Dec;63(6):4609-4622. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02035-2. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
7
Is it the "public" health system? The VOICE model for inclusiveness in universal (national) health systems - lessons from COVID-19.是“公共”卫生系统吗?全民(国家)卫生系统包容性的VOICE模式——来自新冠疫情的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 13;11:1243943. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1243943. eCollection 2023.
8
Community disaster exposure and first onset of depression: A panel analysis of nationally representative South African data, 2008-2017.社区灾难暴露与抑郁症首次发作:对2008 - 2017年具有全国代表性的南非数据的面板分析
PLOS Clim. 2022 Apr 6;1(4):0000024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000024.
9
Caring in crisis: The experiences of local religious leaders meeting community food needs in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic.危机中的关怀:菲律宾当地宗教领袖在新冠疫情期间满足社区食品需求的经历。
Wellbeing Space Soc. 2023 Dec;5:100154. doi: 10.1016/j.wss.2023.100154. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
10
The Role of Faith-Based Organizations in Improving Vaccination Confidence & Addressing Vaccination Disparities to Help Improve Vaccine Uptake: A Systematic Review.基于信仰的组织在提高疫苗接种信心及解决疫苗接种差异以促进疫苗接种率提升方面的作用:一项系统综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;11(2):449. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020449.