• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灾害风险沟通中的模型与组件:一项系统文献综述

Models and components in disaster risk communication: A systematic literature review.

作者信息

Fathollahzadeh Abazar, Salmani Ibrahim, Morowatisharifabad Mohammad Ali, Khajehaminian Mohammad-Reza, Babaie Javad, Fallahzadeh Hossein

机构信息

Department of Health in Disaster and Emergencies, Faculty of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Department of Aging Health, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Mar 31;12:87. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_277_22. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_277_22
PMID:37288399
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10243417/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Risk communication is considered a major factor in disaster risk management by the concerned policymakers and researchers. However, the incoherence of variables affecting risk communication in various studies makes it difficult to plan for disaster risk communication. This study aims to identify and classify the influential components in disaster risk communication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in 2020. Databases included PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. In searching for articles, there was no limit on the date of publication and the language of the article. The research addressed both natural and man-made disasters. The Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA) checklist was followed throughout the research, and the quality of the papers was assessed using the mixed methods evaluation tool (MMAT).

RESULTS

In searching the articles, 3956 documents were obtained, of which 1025 duplicated articles were excluded. The titles and abstracts of the remaining documents (2931) were examined, of which 2822 were deleted, and the full text of 109 documents was studied for further assessment. Finally, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and reviewing the full texts, 32 documents were considered to extract the data and for quality assessment. On studying the full text of the obtained documents, 115 components were found, which were classified into five groups (message, message sender, message receiver, message environment, message process) and 13 subgroups. In addition, the obtained components were classified as those proposed by the authors of the article and those obtained from disaster risk communication models.

CONCLUSION

Identifying the effective components in the disaster risk communication gives a more comprehensive view of risk communication to the disaster managers and executives and provides the decision-makers with an important platform to be able to use the components of risk communication and increase the impact of messages and ultimately increase people's preparedness for disasters in planning operations for the risk communication.

摘要

背景与目的

风险沟通被相关政策制定者和研究人员视为灾害风险管理的一个主要因素。然而,各项研究中影响风险沟通的变量缺乏连贯性,这使得制定灾害风险沟通计划变得困难。本研究旨在识别和分类灾害风险沟通中的影响因素。

材料与方法

本系统评价于2020年进行。数据库包括PubMed、Scopus和科学网。在搜索文章时,对发表日期和文章语言没有限制。该研究涉及自然和人为灾害。在整个研究过程中遵循系统评价和Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单,并使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)评估论文质量。

结果

在搜索文章时,共获得3956篇文献,其中排除1025篇重复文章。对其余文献(2931篇)的标题和摘要进行了审查,删除了其中2822篇,对109篇文献的全文进行了进一步评估。最后,在应用纳入和排除标准并审查全文后,选取32篇文献进行数据提取和质量评估。在研究所得文献的全文时,发现了115个因素,这些因素被分为五组(信息、信息发送者、信息接收者、信息环境、信息过程)和13个子组。此外,所获得的因素被分类为文章作者提出的因素和从灾害风险沟通模型中获得的因素。

结论

识别灾害风险沟通中的有效因素,能让灾害管理人员和执行人员对风险沟通有更全面的认识,并为决策者提供一个重要平台,使其能够利用风险沟通的因素,增强信息的影响力,最终在制定风险沟通行动计划时提高人们对灾害的防范能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cae/10243417/d157d578596d/JEHP-12-87-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cae/10243417/d157d578596d/JEHP-12-87-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cae/10243417/d157d578596d/JEHP-12-87-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Models and components in disaster risk communication: A systematic literature review.灾害风险沟通中的模型与组件:一项系统文献综述
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Mar 31;12:87. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_277_22. eCollection 2023.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Application of Behavioral Theories to Disaster and Emergency Health Preparedness: A Systematic Review.行为理论在灾害与应急卫生准备中的应用:一项系统综述。
PLoS Curr. 2015 Jul 1;7:ecurrents.dis.31a8995ced321301466db400f1357829. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.31a8995ced321301466db400f1357829.
5
Role of Religious Institutions in Disaster Risk Management: A Systematic Review.宗教机构在灾害风险管理中的作用:一项系统综述。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Apr;15(2):239-254. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.145. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
6
Developments in Surge Research Priorities: A Systematic Review of the Literature Following the Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, 2007-2015.激增研究重点的发展:对2007 - 2015年学术急诊医学共识会议后文献的系统评价
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;22(11):1235-52. doi: 10.1111/acem.12815. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
7
Disaster and Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.灾难与多发性硬化症:一项系统综述。
Iran J Public Health. 2022 Sep;51(9):1936-1949. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v51i9.10549.
8
Components of hospital personnel preparedness to evacuate patients in disasters: a systematic review.医院人员在灾害中疏散患者的准备工作的组成部分:系统评价。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 6;24(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00942-x.
9
Tools and Checklists Used for the Evaluation of Hospital Disaster Preparedness: A Systematic Review.用于评估医院灾难准备情况的工具和清单:一项系统综述。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016 Oct;10(5):781-788. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.30. Epub 2016 May 27.
10
Process and components of disaster risk communication in health systems: A thematic analysis.卫生系统中灾害风险沟通的过程与组成部分:一项主题分析
Jamba. 2022 Dec 8;14(1):1367. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1367. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Disaster Health Literacy - development and validation of a short measurement instrument in German to supplement the HLS instruments.灾难健康素养——一种德语简短测量工具的开发与验证,以补充健康素养量表工具。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 25;13:1589705. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1589705. eCollection 2025.
2
Enhancing risk and crisis communication with computational methods: A systematic literature review.利用计算方法加强风险与危机沟通:一项系统文献综述
Risk Anal. 2025 Jul;45(7):1683-1697. doi: 10.1111/risa.17690. Epub 2024 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Community Disaster Resilience in the COVID-19 Outbreak: Insights from Shanghai's Experience in China.新冠疫情下的社区灾害韧性:来自中国上海经验的洞察
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 5;13:3259-3270. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S283447. eCollection 2020.
2
Risk Information Seeking Behavior in Disaster Resettlement: A Case Study of Ankang City, China.灾害安置中的风险信息寻求行为:以中国安康市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 8;17(19):7352. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197352.
3
Effective Risk Communication for Public Health Emergency: Reflection on the COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) Outbreak in Wuhan, China.
公共卫生突发事件中的有效风险沟通:对中国武汉新冠疫情(2019 - 新型冠状病毒)的反思。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Mar 21;8(1):64. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010064.
4
Trust in Humanitarian Aid From the Earthquake in 2017 to COVID-19 in Iran: A Policy Analysis.从 2017 年地震到伊朗 COVID-19:对人道主义援助的信任——政策分析。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Oct;14(5):e7-e10. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.54. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
5
Communicating Recommendations in Public Health Emergencies: The Role of Public Health Authorities.突发公共卫生事件中的建议传播:公共卫生当局的作用。
Health Secur. 2020 Jan/Feb;18(1):21-28. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0073.
6
Trust and the communication of flood risks: comparing the roles of local governments, volunteers in emergency services, and neighbours.信任与洪水风险沟通:比较地方政府、应急服务志愿者和邻居的作用。
J Flood Risk Manag. 2018 Sep;11(3):305-316. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12313. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Risk communication during disease outbreak response in post-Ebola Liberia: experiences in Sinoe and Grand Kru counties.埃博拉疫情后利比里亚疾病爆发应对期间的风险沟通:锡诺州和大吉德县的经验
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 May 28;33(Suppl 2):4. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2019.33.2.16877. eCollection 2019.
8
Facilitating Community Risk Communication for Wide-Area Evacuation during Large-Scale Floods.促进大面积洪水中的社区风险沟通以进行大面积疏散。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 11;16(14):2466. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142466.
9
A Conceptual Model for Evaluating Emergency Risk Communication in Public Health.用于评估公共卫生应急风险沟通的概念模型。
Health Secur. 2018 May/Jun;16(3):193-203. doi: 10.1089/hs.2018.0020.
10
Barriers to and Facilitators of Inter-Organizational Coordination in Response to Disasters: A Grounded Theory Approach.应对灾害时组织间协调的障碍与促进因素:一种扎根理论方法
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017 Jun;11(3):318-325. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.131. Epub 2016 Oct 11.