Center of Digital Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Digital Dentistry of Ministry of Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease 100081, Beijing, China.
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Arrhenius Laboratory, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Oct;64(4):478-484. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the three-dimensional trueness and margin quality of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated by additive 3D gel deposition, compared with those by subtractive milling.
Ten single crowns and ten 4-unit FPDs of different occlusal geometries and margin thickness were fabricated by additive 3D gel deposition (additive group) and subtractive milling (subtractive group). An intraoral scanner was used to digitalize the restorations. 3D deviation analysis was applied and root mean square (RMS) was used to assess the trueness. Margin quality was characterized using optical stereomicroscopy and 3D laser scanning microscopy.
For single crowns with shallow fossae and grooves and normal margin, RMS value of additive group and subtractive group showed no significant difference in external surface, while additive group showed higher RMS value in intaglio surface. As for 4-unit FPDs with deep fossae and grooves and thin margin, RMS value of additive group in external surface was significantly lower than that of subtractive group and in intaglio surface there was no significant difference between two groups. With a 0.5 mm chamfer design, single crowns in additive group showed flawless margin with a smooth contour line, whereas minor flaws could be observed in 4-unit FPDs with thin margin. In subtractive group, restorations showed minor flaws or defects of various number and severity.
Monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated by additive 3D gel deposition have comparable trueness and better margin quality than those fabricated by subtractive milling. Besides it is more capable of enabling complex geometry.
本体外研究旨在评估通过添加 3D 凝胶沉积制造的整体氧化锆修复体的三维精度和边缘质量,与通过减法铣削制造的修复体进行比较。
通过添加 3D 凝胶沉积(添加组)和减法铣削(减法组)制造了十种不同咬合几何形状和边缘厚度的单冠和十种四单位 FPD。使用口内扫描仪对修复体进行数字化。应用三维偏差分析,使用均方根(RMS)评估精度。使用光学立体显微镜和三维激光扫描显微镜来描述边缘质量。
对于浅窝沟和正常边缘的单冠,添加组和减法组的外部表面 RMS 值无显著差异,而凹面 RMS 值添加组更高。对于深窝沟和薄边缘的四单位 FPD,添加组的外部表面 RMS 值明显低于减法组,而凹面 RMS 值两组之间无显著差异。对于 0.5 毫米倒角设计,添加组的单冠边缘无瑕疵,轮廓线光滑,而薄边缘的四单位 FPD 则存在小瑕疵。减法组的修复体则存在不同数量和严重程度的小瑕疵或缺陷。
通过添加 3D 凝胶沉积制造的整体氧化锆修复体具有可比的精度和更好的边缘质量,优于通过减法铣削制造的修复体。此外,它更能实现复杂的几何形状。