• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹泻患者临床检测方法的比较研究

Comparative Study of Clinical Detection Methods in Patients with Diarrhoea.

作者信息

Xiao Yanyan, Liu Yong, Qin Xiaosong

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2020 Jan 21;2020:8753284. doi: 10.1155/2020/8753284. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/8753284
PMID:32064010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6996696/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical application of three methods for detecting in fecal samples.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty fecal specimens were collected and tested for using three methods: (1) the toxigenic culture (TC); (2) the VIDAS enzyme immunoassay (EIA): the VIDAS glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) assay and toxin A/B assay were used to detect GDH antigen and A/B toxin; and (3) the GeneXpert PCR assay. The toxigenic culture was used as a reference to evaluate the performance of the VIDAS EIA and the GeneXpert PCR assay.

RESULTS

Of 150 specimens, 26 carried both A and B toxin genes, and none of the samples were positive for the binary toxin gene. Toxin-producing using three methods: (1) the toxigenic culture (TC); (2) the VIDAS enzyme immunoassay (EIA): the VIDAS glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) assay and toxin A/B assay were used to detect GDH antigen and A/B toxin; and (3) the GeneXpert PCR assay. The toxigenic culture was used as a reference to evaluate the performance of the VIDAS EIA and the GeneXpert PCR assay. using three methods: (1) the toxigenic culture (TC); (2) the VIDAS enzyme immunoassay (EIA): the VIDAS glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) assay and toxin A/B assay were used to detect GDH antigen and A/B toxin; and (3) the GeneXpert PCR assay. The toxigenic culture was used as a reference to evaluate the performance of the VIDAS EIA and the GeneXpert PCR assay.

CONCLUSION

The VIDAS GDH assay is useful for initial screening of using three methods: (1) the toxigenic culture (TC); (2) the VIDAS enzyme immunoassay (EIA): the VIDAS glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) assay and toxin A/B assay were used to detect GDH antigen and A/B toxin; and (3) the GeneXpert PCR assay. The toxigenic culture was used as a reference to evaluate the performance of the VIDAS EIA and the GeneXpert PCR assay.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估三种检测粪便样本中[具体物质]的方法的临床应用。

方法

收集了150份粪便标本,并使用三种方法进行检测:(1)产毒培养(TC);(2)VIDAS酶免疫测定(EIA):使用VIDAS谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)测定和毒素A/B测定来检测GDH抗原和A/B毒素;(3)GeneXpert PCR测定。以产毒培养作为参考来评估VIDAS EIA和GeneXpert PCR测定的性能。

结果

在150份标本中,26份同时携带A和B毒素基因,且没有样本的二元毒素基因呈阳性。使用三种方法检测产毒[具体物质]:(1)产毒培养(TC);(2)VIDAS酶免疫测定(EIA):使用VIDAS谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)测定和毒素A/B测定来检测GDH抗原和A/B毒素;(3)GeneXpert PCR测定。以产毒培养作为参考来评估VIDAS EIA和GeneXpert PCR测定的性能。使用三种方法检测产毒[具体物质]:(1)产毒培养(TC);(2)VIDAS酶免疫测定(EIA):使用VIDAS谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)测定和毒素A/B测定来检测GDH抗原和A/B毒素;(3)GeneXpert PCR测定。以产毒培养作为参考来评估VIDAS EIA和GeneXpert PCR测定的性能。

结论

VIDAS GDH测定对于使用三种方法检测[具体物质]的初步筛查有用:(1)产毒培养(TC);(2)VIDAS酶免疫测定(EIA):使用VIDAS谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)测定和毒素A/B测定来检测GDH抗原和A/B毒素;(3)GeneXpert PCR测定。以产毒培养作为参考来评估VIDAS EIA和GeneXpert PCR测定的性能。

需注意,原文中部分内容重复,翻译时尽量保持了原文的结构和表述。同时,“[具体物质]”表示原文中未明确给出的物质名称。

相似文献

1
Comparative Study of Clinical Detection Methods in Patients with Diarrhoea.腹泻患者临床检测方法的比较研究
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2020 Jan 21;2020:8753284. doi: 10.1155/2020/8753284. eCollection 2020.
2
Evaluation of the VIDAS glutamate dehydrogenase assay for the detection of Clostridium difficile.用于检测艰难梭菌的VIDAS谷氨酸脱氢酶检测法的评估
Anaerobe. 2016 Aug;40:68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
3
Comparative performance of the GeneXpert C. difficile PCR assay and C. diff Quik Chek Complete kit assay for detection of Clostridium difficile antigen and toxins in symptomatic community-onset infections.GeneXpert艰难梭菌PCR检测法与艰难梭菌快速检测全套试剂盒检测有症状社区获得性感染中艰难梭菌抗原和毒素的比较性能
Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Dec;29:244-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.10.025. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
4
[Experience with laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile].[艰难梭菌实验室诊断经验]
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. 2013 Sep;19(3):91-5.
5
Detection of antigen and toxin in stool specimens: Comparison of the quik chek complete enzyme immunoassay and GeneXpert polymerase chain reaction assay.粪便标本中抗原和毒素的检测:快速检测全酶免疫测定法与GeneXpert聚合酶链反应测定法的比较
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul-Aug;23(4):259-262. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_80_17.
6
A Diagnostic Algorithm for the Detection of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea.一种用于检测艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的诊断算法。
Balkan Med J. 2016 Jan;33(1):80-6. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15159. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
7
Performance of laboratory tests for detection for Clostridioides difficile: A multicenter prospective study in Japan.实验室检测用于检测艰难梭菌的性能:日本的一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Anaerobe. 2019 Dec;60:102107. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.102107. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Three Immunoassays for the Simultaneous Detection of Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin A/B.三种免疫分析法同时检测谷氨酸脱氢酶和毒素A/B的比较评估
Microorganisms. 2022 Apr 30;10(5):947. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10050947.
9
Evaluation of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection Based on Immunochromatography Testing and Toxigenic Culture Assay.基于免疫胶体金渗滤法检测和产毒培养检测对艰难梭菌感染危险因素的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Nov 27;56(12). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00555-18. Print 2018 Dec.
10
Clostridium difficile infection diagnostics - evaluation of the C. DIFF Quik Chek Complete assay, a rapid enzyme immunoassay for detection of toxigenic C. difficile in clinical stool samples.艰难梭菌感染诊断——C. DIFF Quik Chek Complete检测法的评估,一种用于检测临床粪便样本中产毒素艰难梭菌的快速酶免疫测定法。
APMIS. 2016 Nov;124(11):1016-1020. doi: 10.1111/apm.12595. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Increase in Isolates from Patients with Recurrence: Results from a Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study.复发病例分离株的最低抑菌浓度增加:一项回顾性单中心队列研究的结果
Microorganisms. 2025 Jun 28;13(7):1515. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13071515.
2
Comparison of Anaerobic Culture Methods for Detecting Clostridioides difficile in Bovine Faeces.比较检测牛粪便中艰难梭菌的厌氧培养方法。
Vet Med Sci. 2025 Jan;11(1):e70085. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70085.
3
A Multifaced Aspect of Infection in Pediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Case Series and Literature Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased environmental sample area and recovery of Clostridium difficile spores from hospital surfaces by quantitative PCR and enrichment culture.通过定量 PCR 和富集培养提高环境样本面积和从医院表面回收艰难梭菌孢子。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):917-923. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.103.
2
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA) 2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.
3
炎症性肠病患儿感染的多方面情况:病例系列及文献综述
J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 20;13(9):1413. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091413.
4
Overview of current detection methods and microRNA potential in infection screening. 感染筛查中当前检测方法和 microRNA 潜力概述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun 14;29(22):3385-3399. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3385.
5
Loop mediated isothermal amplification of Clostridioides difficile isolates in gastrointestinal patients.胃肠道患者中艰难梭菌分离株的环介导等温扩增
AMB Express. 2022 Apr 12;12(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13568-022-01382-1.
6
Diagnostic deficiencies of infection among patients in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia: A laboratory-based case series.沙特阿拉伯一家三级医院患者感染的诊断缺陷:基于实验室的病例系列研究。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Aug;28(8):4472-4477. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.04.044. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
7
Clinical and microbial characterization of toxigenic isolated from antibiotic associated diarrhea in Egypt.从埃及抗生素相关性腹泻中分离出的产毒菌株的临床和微生物学特征
Iran J Microbiol. 2020 Aug;12(4):296-304. doi: 10.18502/ijm.v12i4.3932.
The incidence and drug resistance of Clostridium difficile infection in Mainland China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
中国大陆艰难梭菌感染的发病率和耐药性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 29;6:37865. doi: 10.1038/srep37865.
4
Evaluation of the VIDAS glutamate dehydrogenase assay for the detection of Clostridium difficile.用于检测艰难梭菌的VIDAS谷氨酸脱氢酶检测法的评估
Anaerobe. 2016 Aug;40:68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
5
A Diagnostic Algorithm for the Detection of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea.一种用于检测艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的诊断算法。
Balkan Med J. 2016 Jan;33(1):80-6. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15159. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
6
The First Two Clostridium difficile Ribotype 027/ST1 Isolates Identified in Beijing, China-an Emerging Problem or a Neglected Threat?在中国北京鉴定出的前两株艰难梭菌核糖体分型027/序列型1分离株——一个新出现的问题还是被忽视的威胁?
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 7;6:18834. doi: 10.1038/srep18834.
7
The Role of Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GDH) Testing Assay in the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infections: A High Sensitive Screening Test and an Essential Step in the Proposed Laboratory Diagnosis Workflow for Developing Countries like China.谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)检测法在艰难梭菌感染诊断中的作用:一项高灵敏度筛查试验及中国等发展中国家拟议的实验室诊断工作流程中的关键步骤。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144604. eCollection 2015.
8
Comparison of the Vidas C. difficile GDH Automated Enzyme-Linked Fluorescence Immunoassay (ELFA) with Another Commercial Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) (Quik Chek-60), Two Selective Media, and a PCR Assay for gluD for Detection of Clostridium difficile in Fecal Samples.Vidas艰难梭菌谷氨酸脱氢酶自动酶联荧光免疫分析(ELFA)与另一种商业酶免疫分析(EIA)(Quik Chek-60)、两种选择性培养基以及用于检测粪便样本中艰难梭菌的谷氨酸脱氢酶基因(gluD)聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测法的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jun;53(6):1931-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00649-15. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
9
Impact of polymerase chain reaction testing on Clostridium difficile infection rates in an acute health care facility.聚合酶链反应检测对一家急性医疗机构艰难梭菌感染率的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Apr 1;43(4):383-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.12.021. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
10
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.艰难梭菌感染的诊断:临床医生和临床实验室面临的持续难题。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Jul;26(3):604-30. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-13.