Suppr超能文献

比较医院出院时药剂师技术人员和医生的药物转录错误。

Comparison of pharmacy technicians' and doctors' medication transcribing errors at hospital discharge.

机构信息

Clinical Education Department, St. Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals, Merseyside, L355DR, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jan;27(1):9-13. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001538. Epub 2018 Jul 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the transcribing error rates of discharge prescriptions between pharmacy technicians and doctors in an acute hospital setting.

METHODS

Pharmacy technicians were trained in the transcribing of discharge medications from inpatient to discharge medication charts. Prospective prescribing audits were undertaken over 5 days on eight hospital medical wards by ward pharmacists to compare pharmacy technician (on four wards) and doctor (on four wards) discharge transcribing error rates. Transcribed discharge medications were compared with the inpatient medication list by ward pharmacists to identify any transcription errors. Transcribing data for each technician and doctor, and number of items and errors, were input into SPSS and analysed using relevant statistical tests.

RESULTS

Doctors (n=12) transcribed 77 discharge prescriptions, and 678 items with 127 errors recorded (18.7% error rate). Pharmacy technicians (n=8) transcribed 63 discharge prescriptions, and 654 items with 25 errors recorded (3.8% error rate), a significant difference between groups in error frequency (χ(1)=58.6, p=<0.005) with a 14.9% difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacy technicians have significantly lower discharge transcribing error rates compared with doctors. This service intervention has the potential to improve patient safety and minimise inefficiencies from correcting errors. Further work is needed to explore the views and opinions of service users of the intervention, and why technician-transcribing error rates are significantly lower than doctors.

摘要

目的

比较药剂师和医生在急性医院环境下对出院医嘱的转录错误率。

方法

药剂师接受了将住院患者的药物转抄到出院医嘱单上的培训。药剂师在 5 天内对 8 个医院病房的处方进行了前瞻性审查,以比较药剂师(4 个病房)和医生(4 个病房)的出院转录错误率。病房药剂师将转录的出院药物与住院药物清单进行比较,以确定任何转录错误。将每位技术员和医生的转录数据以及项目和错误数量输入 SPSS 进行分析,并使用相关的统计检验进行分析。

结果

医生(n=12)转录了 77 份出院医嘱,记录了 127 个错误(18.7%的错误率)。药剂师(n=8)转录了 63 份出院医嘱,记录了 654 个项目和 25 个错误(3.8%的错误率),两组之间的错误频率差异显著(χ²(1)=58.6,p<0.005),两组之间的差异为 14.9%。

结论

药剂师的出院转录错误率明显低于医生。这种服务干预有可能提高患者安全性并最大限度地减少纠正错误所带来的效率低下。需要进一步研究服务使用者对干预措施的看法和意见,以及为什么技术员转录错误率明显低于医生。

相似文献

4
Exploring the impact of feedback on prescribing error rates: a pilot study.探索反馈对处方错误率的影响:一项试点研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Oct;39(5):1013-1017. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0503-x. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

本文引用的文献

8
A solid grounding: prescribing skills training.坚实基础:处方技能培训
Clin Teach. 2015 Jun;12(3):187-92. doi: 10.1111/tct.12281.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验