van Zadelhoff Claudia, Schwarz Tobias, Smith Sionagh, Engerand Antoine, Taylor Sarah
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Roslin, United Kingdom.
INSEAD Business School, Fontainebleau, France.
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 28;6:508. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00508. eCollection 2019.
To describe detectable and non-detectable naturally occurring cartilage damage of the equine distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint using plain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and gadolinium and saline MR arthrography. The second objective was to quantify the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in detection of cartilage damage. In a pilot study, the distal limbs of two horses with confirmed osteoarthritis of the DIP joint were imaged with low-field MR. Magnetic resonance images were assessed in consensus by three observers and compared to gross pathological findings. Subsequently, a prospective analytical cross-sectional study design was created to compare pre-contrast MR imaging and saline and gadolinium MR arthrography of isolated equine distal limbs to gross observation findings. Hallmarq® low-field MR (0.27T) scans were performed prior to DIP joint injection, saline/gadolinium post-injection scans were performed at 15 min intervals for 2 h. Joints were inspected and the articular cartilage graded subjectively for cartilage damage (0-3). The presence of detectable or non-detectable cartilage damage on MR images was identified, characterized and recorded in consensus by three observers. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in detection of cartilage damage related to gross pathology were calculated. The two clinical cases from the pilot study with confirmed osteoarthritis had full thickness cartilage defects; however, only one of these was correctly identified using low-field MRI. In the prospective study, the majority of naturally occurring cartilage damage could not be identified on plain MR or MR arthrography including extensive partial thickness cartilage erosions. Saline and gadolinium MR arthrography did not improve the detection of cartilage damage. The accuracy of cartilage damage detection was 0.63 with a sensitivity of 0.14 and specificity of 0.92. Both, plain low-field MRI and MR arthrography are not sensitive in detection of naturally occurring cartilage damage of the DIP joint. However, if an abnormal contour is seen in the articular cartilage, cartilage damage is likely to be present.
使用普通磁共振(MR)成像以及钆和盐水MR关节造影来描述马远侧指间(DIP)关节可检测到和不可检测到的自然发生的软骨损伤。第二个目标是量化软骨损伤检测中的敏感性、特异性和准确性。在一项初步研究中,对两匹确诊患有DIP关节骨关节炎的马的远端肢体进行了低场MR成像。三名观察者共同评估磁共振图像,并与大体病理结果进行比较。随后,设计了一项前瞻性分析性横断面研究,以比较孤立马远端肢体的对比前MR成像、盐水和钆MR关节造影与大体观察结果。在DIP关节注射前进行Hallmarq®低场MR(0.27T)扫描,注射盐水/钆后每隔15分钟进行一次扫描,共进行2小时。检查关节,并对关节软骨的损伤情况进行主观分级(0 - 3级)。三名观察者共同确定、描述并记录MR图像上可检测到或不可检测到的软骨损伤情况。计算与大体病理相关的软骨损伤检测的敏感性、特异性和准确性。初步研究中的两例确诊为骨关节炎的临床病例存在全层软骨缺损;然而,使用低场MRI仅正确识别出其中一例。在前瞻性研究中,在普通MR或MR关节造影上无法识别大多数自然发生的软骨损伤,包括广泛的部分厚度软骨侵蚀。盐水和钆MR关节造影并未改善软骨损伤的检测。软骨损伤检测的准确性为0.63,敏感性为0.14,特异性为0.92。普通低场MRI和MR关节造影在检测DIP关节自然发生的软骨损伤方面均不敏感。然而,如果在关节软骨中看到异常轮廓,则可能存在软骨损伤。