Aßmann Anton, Ohlerth Stefanie, Hartmann Silvana, Torgerson Paul, Bischofberger Andrea
Equine Hospital, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Clinic of Diagnostic Imaging, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Dec 7;13(24):3772. doi: 10.3390/ani13243772.
Tenosynovitis of the digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) is diagnosed using ultrasonography and contrast tenography. Nevertheless, making a precise preoperative diagnosis is challenging. This study aimed to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of low-field MRI and MRI tenography (MRIt) to detect artificially created soft-tissue lesions in the DFTS. In 21 DFTSs, 118 lesions were made tenoscopically in the superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT), deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT), manica flexoria (MF) and proximal scutum. MRI and MRI, following intrathecal gadolinium administration (MRIt), were performed. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI and MRIt were calculated and compared. Proximal scutum lesions were less frequently identified by MRI (Sensitivity 38%, specificity 96%) compared to MRIt (Sensitivity: 50%, = 0.80; specificity: 96%, = 1). This was similar for SDFT lesions (Sensitivity: 39% versus 54%, = 0.72; specificity: 93% versus 96%, = 1). MRI detected DDFT lesions (sensitivity 34%; specificity 100%) better than MRIt (sensitivity 32%, = 0.77; specificity 98%, = 1). This was similar for MF lesions (MRI sensitivity 61%; specificity 100% vs. MRIt sensitivity 50%, = 0.68; specificity 96%, = 1). Lesion size was significantly associated with MRI or MRIt diagnosis ( = 0.001). The intrathecal administration of gadolinium did not significantly improve the ability of low-field MRI to diagnose artificial DFTS tendon lesions. Small lesion length was a significant discriminating factor for lesion detection. MRI and MRIt specificity were high, thus being helpful in diagnosing an intact structure.
指屈肌腱鞘炎(DFTS)通过超声检查和造影腱鞘造影进行诊断。然而,进行精确的术前诊断具有挑战性。本研究旨在确定并比较低场MRI和MRI腱鞘造影(MRIt)检测DFTS中人工制造的软组织病变的敏感性和特异性。在21个DFTS中,通过腱鞘镜在指浅屈肌腱(SDFT)、指深屈肌腱(DDFT)、屈肌总腱鞘(MF)和近端盾板处制造了118个病变。在鞘内注射钆剂后进行MRI和MRIt检查。计算并比较了MRI和MRIt的敏感性和特异性。与MRIt(敏感性:50%,κ = 0.80;特异性:96%,κ = 1)相比,MRI对近端盾板病变的识别频率较低(敏感性38%,特异性96%)。SDFT病变情况类似(敏感性:39%对54%,κ = 0.72;特异性:93%对96%,κ = 1)。MRI检测DDFT病变(敏感性34%;特异性100%)优于MRIt(敏感性32%,κ = 0.77;特异性98%,κ = 1)。MF病变情况类似(MRI敏感性61%;特异性100%,而MRIt敏感性50%,κ = 0.68;特异性96%,κ = 1)。病变大小与MRI或MRIt诊断显著相关(P = 0.001)。鞘内注射钆剂并未显著提高低场MRI诊断人工DFTS肌腱病变的能力。较小的病变长度是病变检测的一个重要鉴别因素。MRI和MRIt的特异性较高,因此有助于诊断完整结构。