Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Cogn Emot. 2020 Aug;34(5):960-969. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1710110. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
In recognition memory paradigms, emotional details are often recognised better than neutral ones, but at the cost of memory for peripheral details. We previously provided evidence that, when peripheral details must be recalled using central details as cues, peripheral details from emotional scenes are at least as likely to be recalled as those from neutral scenes. Here we replicated and explicated this result by implementing a mathematical modelling approach to disambiguate the influence of target type, scene emotionality, scene valence, and their interactions. After incidentally encoding scenes that included neutral backgrounds with a positive, negative, or neutral foreground objects, participants showed equal or better cued recall of components from emotional scenes compared to neutral scenes. There was no evidence of emotion-based impairment in cued recall in either of two experiments, including one in which we replicated the emotion-induced memory trade-off in recognition. Mathematical model fits indicated that the emotionality of the encoded scene was the primary driver of improved cued-recall performance. Thus, even when emotion impairs recognition of peripheral components of scenes, it can preserve the ability to recall which scene components were studied together.
在再认记忆范式中,情绪细节通常比中性细节更容易被识别,但代价是对周边细节的记忆。我们之前的研究提供了证据,当必须使用中央细节作为线索来回忆周边细节时,情绪场景的周边细节的召回率至少与中性场景的一样高。在这里,我们通过实施一种数学建模方法来复制和阐明这一结果,以区分目标类型、场景情绪、场景效价及其相互作用的影响。在偶然编码了包含中性背景和正面、负面或中性前景物体的场景后,参与者在被提示回忆时表现出与中性场景相比,对情绪场景的组件有相等或更好的回忆。在两个实验中都没有证据表明提示回忆中的情绪依赖损害,包括一个我们复制了识别中情绪诱导的记忆权衡的实验。数学模型拟合表明,编码场景的情绪是提高提示回忆表现的主要驱动因素。因此,即使情绪会损害对场景周边成分的识别,它也可以保留回忆一起学习过的场景成分的能力。