Ventura-Bort Carlos, Katsumi Yuta, Wirkner Janine, Wendt Julia, Schwabe Lars, Hamm Alfons O, Dolcos Florin, Weymar Mathias
Department of Biological Psychology and Affective Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 30;15:1459617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1459617. eCollection 2024.
It has long been known that highly arousing emotional single items are better recollected than low arousing neutral items. Despite the robustness of this memory advantage, emotional arousing events may not always promote the retrieval of source details (i.e., source memory) or associated neutral information.
To shed more light on these effects, we pooled data from seven different studies ( = 333) to investigate the role of emotion on item-context binding in episodic memory, as well as potential interacting factors (e.g., encoding instructions, type of retrieval task, or acute stress). In all studies, participants incidentally encoded common neutral objects (i.e., items), overlaid on different pleasant, neutral, or unpleasant background scenes (i.e., contexts). One week later, the encoded objects were presented intermixed with new ones and memory for item and source contextual details was tested, also considering the contribution of recollection and familiarity-based processes.
Linear mixed models revealed a recollection-based retrieval advantage for unpleasant and pleasant source contextual details compared to neutral ones. Bayes hypothesis-testing analysis further indicated decisive evidence in favor of a relevant role of emotional arousal and recollection in source contextual memory. Regarding item memory, linear mixed models revealed enhanced recollection-based memory for items encoded in pleasant contexts compared to their neutral and unpleasant counterparts. However, Bayes analysis revealed strong to moderate evidence for models without affective category (or its interactions), indicating that the affective category of contexts in which objects were paired during encoding had little influence on item memory performance.
The present results are discussed in relation to existing evidence and current neurobiological models of emotional episodic memory by also emphasizing the role of predictive processing as a useful conceptual framework to understand the effects of emotion on memory for source details and associated neutral information.
长期以来,人们一直知道,引发高度唤醒的情绪化单一项目比引发低唤醒的中性项目更容易被回忆起来。尽管这种记忆优势很稳固,但情绪唤起事件可能并不总是能促进源细节(即源记忆)或相关中性信息的检索。
为了更深入地了解这些影响,我们汇总了七项不同研究的数据(N = 333),以研究情绪在情景记忆中项目 - 情境绑定中的作用,以及潜在的相互作用因素(例如,编码指令、检索任务类型或急性应激)。在所有研究中,参与者偶然对叠加在不同愉悦、中性或不愉快背景场景(即情境)上的常见中性物体(即项目)进行编码。一周后,将编码的物体与新物体混合呈现,并测试对项目和源情境细节的记忆,同时考虑回忆和基于熟悉度的过程的贡献。
线性混合模型显示,与中性情境相比,不愉快和愉悦的源情境细节在基于回忆的检索方面具有优势。贝叶斯假设检验分析进一步表明,有决定性证据支持情绪唤起和回忆在源情境记忆中的相关作用。关于项目记忆,线性混合模型显示,与中性和不愉快情境中编码的项目相比,在愉悦情境中编码的项目基于回忆的记忆得到增强。然而,贝叶斯分析显示,对于没有情感类别(或其相互作用)的模型,有强到中等强度的证据,表明在编码过程中与物体配对的情境的情感类别对项目记忆表现影响不大。
结合现有证据和当前情绪情景记忆的神经生物学模型对本研究结果进行了讨论,同时强调了预测处理作为理解情绪对源细节记忆和相关中性信息影响的有用概念框架的作用。