• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助化疗可改善伴有病理血管浸润的局限性上尿路上皮癌患者的总生存期:多机构队列的倾向评分匹配分析。

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival in patients with localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma harboring pathologic vascular invasion: a propensity score-matched analysis of multi-institutional cohort.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.

Translational Research Program, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2020 Dec;38(12):3183-3190. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03118-x. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-020-03118-x
PMID:32065276
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) offers survival benefit is still controversial. To explore the impact of AC on overall survival (OS) of cN0M0 UTUC patients, we conducted a propensity score-matched analysis using the regression model, including pathologic features such as lymphatic and vascular invasion.

METHODS

A multi-institutional cohort of 413 UTUC patient record was used. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias by potential confounding factors for survival, including pathologic features from the specimen of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were identified as pair-matched groups (49 patients in RNU and 49 patients in RNU + AC). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that a 5-year OS rate of 72.7% for patients treated with RNU + AC was significantly higher than 51.6% for those treated with RNU (p = 0.0156). On multivariate analysis, pathologic vascular invasion (HR 3.41, 95% CI 1.24-10.66, p = 0.0166) and administration of AC (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.19-0.98, p = 0.0438) still remained as the significant predictors for OS. In patients with pathologic vascular invasion (51 of 98 patients), a significantly longer OS in RNU + AC groups was observed (median OS of 30 and 70 months in RNU and RNU + AC groups, respectively: p = 0.0432), whereas there was no significant difference in the OS between RNU (median OS: not reached) and RNU + AC (median OS: not reached) groups in patients without the invasion (p = 0.4549).

CONCLUSION

The result indicates a significant benefit for OS by the administration of AC, and pathologic vascular invasion in the specimen of RNU could help the patient selection to better predict the effect of AC.

摘要

目的

辅助化疗(AC)对上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者的生存获益是否仍存在争议。为了探讨 AC 对 cN0M0UTUC 患者总生存(OS)的影响,我们使用回归模型进行了倾向评分匹配分析,包括淋巴血管侵犯等病理特征。

方法

利用多机构队列 413 例 UTUC 患者的记录进行了研究。采用倾向评分匹配以减少生存相关的潜在混杂因素的偏倚,包括根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)标本的病理特征。

结果

确定了 98 例配对组患者(RNU 组 49 例,RNU+AC 组 49 例)。Kaplan-Meier 曲线表明,RNU+AC 组的 5 年 OS 率为 72.7%,显著高于 RNU 组的 51.6%(p=0.0156)。多变量分析显示,病理血管侵犯(HR3.41,95%CI1.24-10.66,p=0.0166)和 AC 治疗(HR0.45,95%CI0.19-0.98,p=0.0438)仍然是 OS 的显著预测因素。在有病理血管侵犯的患者(98 例中的 51 例)中,RNU+AC 组的 OS 明显更长(RNU 组和 RNU+AC 组的中位 OS 分别为 30 个月和 70 个月:p=0.0432),而无侵犯的患者中 RNU(中位 OS:未达到)和 RNU+AC(中位 OS:未达到)之间的 OS 无显著差异(p=0.4549)。

结论

结果表明,AC 的应用显著提高了 OS,RNU 标本中的病理血管侵犯有助于选择患者以更好地预测 AC 的效果。

相似文献

1
Adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival in patients with localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma harboring pathologic vascular invasion: a propensity score-matched analysis of multi-institutional cohort.辅助化疗可改善伴有病理血管浸润的局限性上尿路上皮癌患者的总生存期:多机构队列的倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Urol. 2020 Dec;38(12):3183-3190. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03118-x. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Residual Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后残余上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的肿瘤学结局。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Oct;7(5):1061-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.010. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Improved Survival After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.辅助全身治疗改善上尿路尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术的生存。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):7229-7236. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15814-8. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
4
Adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy improves the survival outcome of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients with cardiovascular comorbidity.根治性肾输尿管切除术(radical nephroureterectomy)后辅助化疗可改善伴有心血管合并症的高危上尿路上皮癌患者的生存结局。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 19;10(1):17674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74940-x.
5
Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and lymphovascular invasion after radical nephroureterectomy.辅助化疗对根治性肾输尿管切除术后上尿路尿路上皮癌伴淋巴管侵犯患者的影响。
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jan;56(1):41-7. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.41. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
6
Pathologic stage as a surrogate for oncologic outcomes after receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.接受新辅助化疗治疗高级别上尿路尿路上皮癌后的病理分期可替代肿瘤学结局。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Dec;38(12):933.e7-933.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.025. Epub 2020 May 16.
7
Open versus minimally invasive nephroureterectomy in octogenarians: An analysis of surgical approach trends, outcomes, and survival analysis with propensity matching.80 岁以上患者行开放性与微创性肾输尿管切除术的对比:倾向评分匹配法分析手术方式趋势、结局和生存分析。
Urol Oncol. 2024 Jul;42(7):220.e9-220.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
8
Adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy does not improve survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a joint study by the European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists and the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration.根治性肾输尿管切除术后辅助化疗不能提高上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的生存率:欧洲泌尿外科协会 - 青年学术泌尿外科医生与上尿路尿路上皮癌协作组的联合研究。
BJU Int. 2018 Feb;121(2):252-259. doi: 10.1111/bju.14020. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
9
Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.辅助化疗可提高高危上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的生存率:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Urol. 2017 Dec 1;17(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0305-4.
10
Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.新辅助化疗与辅助化疗治疗上尿路上皮癌。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Aug;38(8):684.e9-684.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy analysis of intelligent pressure-controlled ureteroscopy combined with thulium laser in the treatment of isolated upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.智能压力控制输尿管镜联合铥激光治疗孤立性上尿路尿路上皮癌的临床疗效分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 15;14:1406031. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1406031. eCollection 2024.
2
Nephron-sparing ureteroscopic surgery vs. radical nephroureterectomy: comparable survival-outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.肾单位保留的输尿管镜手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术:在上尿路尿路上皮癌中具有可比的生存结局。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3585-3591. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04687-3. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
3
Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.
上尿路尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术后的肿瘤学结局:文献综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Aug 31;12(8):1351-1362. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-882. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
The role of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy.根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌患者的围手术期化疗作用。
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):3205-3230. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04330-1. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
5
Inadvertent radical nephrectomy leads to worse prognosis in renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma patients: A propensity score-matched study.意外根治性肾切除术导致肾盂尿路上皮癌患者预后更差:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 30;12:948223. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.948223. eCollection 2022.