School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Jun 15;41(9):2389-2405. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24953. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Naming individual objects is accompanied with semantic recognition. Previous studies examined brain-networks responsible for these operations individually. However, it remains unclear how these brain-networks are related. To address this problem, we examined the brain-networks during a novel object-naming task, requiring participants to name animals in photographs at a specific-level (e.g., "pigeon"). When the participants could not remember specific names, they answered basic names (e.g., "bird"). After fMRI scanning during the object-naming task, the participants rated familiarity of the animals based on their sense of knowing. Since participants tend to remember specific names for familiar objects compared with unfamiliar objects, a typical issue in an object-naming task is an internal covariance between the naming and familiarity levels. We removed this confounding factor by adjusting the familiarity/naming level of stimuli, and demonstrated distinct brain regions related to the two operations. Among them, the left inferior frontal gyrus triangularis (IFGtri) contained object-naming and semantic-recognition related areas in its anterior-ventral and posterior-dorsal parts, respectively. Psychophysiological interaction analyses suggested that both parts show connectivity with the brain regions related to object-naming. By examining the connectivity under control tasks requiring nonlexical semantic retrieval (e.g., animal's body color), we found that both IFGtri parts altered their targeting brain areas according to the required memory attributes, while only the posterior-dorsal part connected the brain regions related to semantic recognition. Together, the semantic recognition may be processed by distinct brain network from those for voluntary semantic retrievals including object-naming although all these networks are mediated by the posterior-dorsal IFGtri.
命名单个物体伴随着语义识别。先前的研究分别检查了负责这些操作的大脑网络。然而,这些大脑网络是如何相关的仍不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们在一项新的物体命名任务中检查了大脑网络,要求参与者在特定水平上命名照片中的动物(例如“鸽子”)。当参与者无法记住特定的名字时,他们会回答基本的名字(例如“鸟”)。在 fMRI 扫描期间进行物体命名任务后,参与者根据他们的感觉知识对动物的熟悉度进行评分。由于参与者倾向于为熟悉的物体记住特定的名字,而不是不熟悉的物体,因此物体命名任务中的一个典型问题是命名和熟悉度水平之间的内部协方差。我们通过调整刺激的熟悉度/命名水平来消除这种混杂因素,并展示了与这两种操作相关的不同大脑区域。其中,左侧额下回三角区(IFGtri)的前腹侧和后背侧部分分别包含与物体命名和语义识别相关的区域。心理生理交互分析表明,这两个部分都与与物体命名相关的大脑区域具有连接性。通过检查需要非词汇语义检索的控制任务下的连接性(例如,动物的身体颜色),我们发现,IFGtri 的两个部分都根据所需的记忆属性改变了其目标大脑区域,而只有后背侧部分与语义识别相关的大脑区域相连。总的来说,语义识别可能是通过与包括物体命名在内的自愿语义检索不同的大脑网络来处理的,尽管所有这些网络都由后背侧 IFGtri 介导。