McMaster University.
Can Rev Sociol. 2020 Feb;57(1):7-33. doi: 10.1111/cars.12274.
Over the past decade Canadian sociology has engaged in spirited debates on the sociology of sociological research, but it has barely begun to address its relation to Indigenous theorizing, scholarship, and politics. How does the discipline deal with the settler colonial history and current realities of Indigenous social lives, and where is the place in our field for Indigenous voices and perspectives? Drawing on Coulthard's politics of recognition and Tuck's damage-centered research, we present here the first systematic empirical analysis of the place of Indigeneity in the Canadian Review of Sociology and the Canadian Journal of Sociology. We situate the presence of Indigeneity in Canadian sociology journals in the sociopolitical context of the time, and examine how imperialism, statism, and damage are oriented within the two journals. Most importantly, we challenge the silence in the discipline's intellectual frames and research programs with respect to Indigenous theorizing about the social world.
在过去的十年中，加拿大社会学界就社会学研究的社会学进行了激烈的辩论，但几乎没有开始解决它与本土理论、学术和政治的关系。该学科如何处理定居者殖民历史和当前的土著社会生活现实，以及我们领域中土著声音和观点的位置在哪里？借鉴库尔思哈德的承认政治学和塔克的以损害为中心的研究，我们在这里首次对加拿大社会学评论和加拿大社会学杂志中本土性的地位进行了系统的实证分析。我们将加拿大社会学杂志中本土性的存在置于当时的社会政治背景下，并考察帝国主义、国家主义和损害在这两个杂志中的定位。最重要的是，我们挑战了该学科在其知识框架和研究计划中对关于社会世界的本土理论的沉默。
