Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Post 635, Kildegaardsvej 28, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021 Apr 9;7(FI1):f93-f100. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa011.
To compare the risk of all-cause mortality, stroke, and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular heart disease (VHD) treated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or factor Xa-inhibitors (FXa-I; rivaroxaban and apixaban).
We cross-linked data from Danish nationwide registries identifying patients with AF and VHD (aortic stenosis/insufficiency, mitral insufficiency, bioprosthetic heart valves, mitral-, and aortic valve repair) initiating VKA or FXa-I between January 2014 and June 2017. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, stroke, and bleeding. Using cause-specific Cox regression, we reported the standardized absolute 2-year risk of the outcomes and absolute risk differences (ARD). We identified 1115 (41.7%), 620 (23.1%), and 942 (35.2%) patients initiating treatment with VKA, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively. The standardized absolute risk (95% confidence interval) of all-cause mortality associated with VKA treatment was 34.1% (30.4-37.8%) with corresponding ARD for FXa-I of -2.7% (-6.7% to 1.4%). The standardized absolute risk of stroke for VKA was 3.8% (2.2-5.4%) with corresponding ARD for FXa-I of -0.1% (-2.0% to 1.8%). The standardized risk of bleeding for VKA was 10.4% (7.2-12.9%) with corresponding ARD for FXa-I of -2.0% (-5.1% to 1.1%). The risk of bleeding was significantly reduced in subgroup analyses of apixaban compared with VKA [ARD: -3.9% (-7.0% to -0.9%)] and rivaroxaban [ARD: -5.6% (-9.5% to -1.7%)].
In this nationwide cohort study, there were no significant differences in the risks of all-cause mortality, stroke, and bleeding in patients with AF and VHD treated with VKA compared with FXa-I.
比较伴有心房颤动(AF)和心脏瓣膜病(VHD)的患者接受维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)或因子 Xa 抑制剂(FXa-I;利伐沙班和阿哌沙班)治疗后的全因死亡率、卒中和出血风险。
我们交叉链接了丹麦全国性登记处的数据,以确定 2014 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月期间开始接受 VKA 或 FXa-I 治疗的伴有 AF 和 VHD(主动脉瓣狭窄/功能不全、二尖瓣功能不全、生物瓣、二尖瓣和主动脉瓣修复)的患者。结局为全因死亡率、卒中和出血。我们使用病因特异性 Cox 回归报告了 2 年结局的标准化绝对风险和绝对风险差异(ARD)。我们分别确定了 1115(41.7%)、620(23.1%)和 942(35.2%)例患者开始接受 VKA、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班治疗。与 VKA 治疗相关的全因死亡率的标准化绝对风险(95%置信区间)为 34.1%(30.4-37.8%),相应的 FXa-I 的 ARD 为-2.7%(-6.7%至 1.4%)。VKA 治疗的卒的标准化绝对风险为 3.8%(2.2-5.4%),相应的 FXa-I 的 ARD 为-0.1%(-2.0%至 1.8%)。VKA 出血的标准化风险为 10.4%(7.2-12.9%),相应的 FXa-I 的 ARD 为-2.0%(-5.1%至 1.1%)。与 VKA 相比,阿哌沙班亚组分析中出血风险显著降低[ARD:-3.9%(-7.0%至-0.9%)]和利伐沙班[ARD:-5.6%(-9.5%至-1.7%)]。
在这项全国性队列研究中,伴有 AF 和 VHD 的患者接受 VKA 与 FXa-I 治疗的全因死亡率、卒中和出血风险无显著差异。