Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, United States.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, United States.
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Apr;145:229-237. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.01.022. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
There is limited retrospective evidence addressing the utility of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T3N0 breast cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) comparing overall survival (OS) in T3N0 patients treated with mastectomy alone (MTX) or with PMRT.
We performed a matched-cohort analysis of NCDB breast cancer patients with pT3N0 disease who did not receive NAC, or cT3N0 patients who received NAC treated between 2006 and 2014. Patients were matched for all available baseline characteristics using propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with stabilized weights.
We identified 13,901 eligible patients. In the pT3N0 cohort, median follow-up was 47 months for the MTX group and 50 months for the PMRT group. In the cT3N0 cohort, median follow-up was 44 months for the MTX group and 46 months for the PMRT group. OS was higher in pT3N0 patients treated with PMRT compared to MTX: 7-year OS of 74% vs. 65% (P < 0.001). Doubly robust multivariable analysis showed an association between PMRT and improved OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.89, P < 0.001). There was no benefit to PMRT in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). In the NAC cohort, PMRT did not change OS, with 7-year OS of 78% with MTX and 79% with PMRT. There was a trend of improved OS with PMRT in patients with residual disease in the breast and lymph nodes (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.46-1.07).
PMRT improves OS in patients with pT3N0 disease, but the benefit appears limited to those who do not receive AC. PMRT does not improve OS in patients with cT3N0 disease who receive NAC, but there might be a benefit in patients with a poor response to chemotherapy. However, longer follow-up may be needed to make a definitive conclusion about the benefit of PMRT in patients who receive chemotherapy.
目前仅有有限的回顾性证据表明保乳手术后放疗(PMRT)在 T3N0 乳腺癌患者中的应用价值。我们对国家癌症数据库(NCDB)进行了回顾性分析,比较了单纯乳房切除术(MTX)和 PMRT 治疗 T3N0 患者的总生存(OS)。
我们对 2006 年至 2014 年期间未接受新辅助化疗(NAC)的 pT3N0 疾病或接受 NAC 的 cT3N0 患者进行了 NCDB 乳腺癌患者的匹配队列分析。采用倾向评分和逆概率治疗加权(IPTW),用稳定权重进行匹配,以比较所有基线特征。
我们共纳入了 13901 名符合条件的患者。在 pT3N0 队列中,MTX 组的中位随访时间为 47 个月,PMRT 组为 50 个月。在 cT3N0 队列中,MTX 组的中位随访时间为 44 个月,PMRT 组为 46 个月。与 MTX 相比,PMRT 治疗的 pT3N0 患者的 OS 更高:7 年 OS 为 74% vs. 65%(P<0.001)。双重稳健多变量分析显示 PMRT 与改善 OS 相关(HR 0.78,95%CI 0.68-0.89,P<0.001)。在接受辅助化疗(AC)的患者中,PMRT 无获益。在 NAC 队列中,PMRT 并未改变 OS,MTX 组的 7 年 OS 为 78%,PMRT 组为 79%。在乳房和淋巴结仍有残留疾病的患者中,PMRT 有改善 OS 的趋势(HR 0.70,95%CI 0.46-1.07)。
PMRT 可改善 pT3N0 疾病患者的 OS,但获益似乎仅限于未接受 AC 的患者。PMRT 不能改善接受 NAC 的 cT3N0 疾病患者的 OS,但在对化疗反应不佳的患者中可能有获益。然而,可能需要更长的随访时间才能对接受化疗的患者接受 PMRT 的获益做出明确的结论。