Research Group in Sports Biomechanics (GIBD), Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Sport Performance and Physical Fitness Research Group (UIRFIDE), Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Gait Posture. 2020 Mar;77:250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
Improving gait is in exercise programs for older adults (OAs) but little is known about how different gait-training approaches affect spatiotemporal parameters and plantar pressure distributions in OAs. High plantar pressures are linked to tissue injury risk, ulceration, and pain in OAs, but no studies have yet compared how they affect podobarometric variables.
The effect of changing plantar pressure on absolute and mean maximum pressure, the pressure-time integral, stride time, stance time, and gait speed in OAs following either a multicomponent training program (EG) or interval-walking training (WG).
Comfortable gait speed, strength (seat-to-stand test), and plantar pressure (Pedar-X mobile in-shoe system), were evaluated in 23 OAs (EG: n = 12, 7 female, 71.58 ± 4.56 years; WG: n = 11, 6 female, 69.64 ± 3.56 years), by dividing the plantar area into 9 regions.
After 14 weeks, the maximum pressure in medial and central metatarsus areas in the dominant leg were reduced in the EG (p = 0.01 &p = 0.04, respectively), but increased in the non-dominant leg lateral heel in the WG (p = 0.03). The mean maximum pressure also increased in the WG in medial heel in the dominant leg (p = 0.02) and lateral heel in the non-dominant leg (p = 0.03). The overall pressure-time integral reduced in the whole plantar area in both legs in both groups. WG reduced stride time (dominant: p = 0.01; non-dominant: p = 0.01) and stance time (dominant: p < 0.005; non-dominant: p < 0.005). Gait speed did not change in any group. As expected, lower limb strength improved after both exercise programs (EG: p = 0.02; WG: p = 0.01).
Although these training interventions were short, they indicate the importance of exercise types. Our results suggest that OAs might benefit from periodized training, especially when multicomponent programs are introduced prior to the walking goals. Future, larger studies should explore situations in which special populations with specific foot problems might benefit from these interventions.
改善步态是老年人(OA)运动计划的一部分,但对于不同的步态训练方法如何影响 OA 的时空参数和足底压力分布知之甚少。高足底压力与 OA 组织损伤风险、溃疡和疼痛有关,但尚无研究比较它们如何影响类似的生物力学变量。
改变足底压力对 OA 进行多组分训练方案(EG)或间歇步行训练(WG)后绝对和平均最大压力、压力-时间积分、步幅时间、站立时间和步行速度的影响。
在 23 名 OA 中评估舒适的步行速度、力量(从座位到站立测试)和足底压力(Pedar-X 移动鞋内系统),将足底区域分为 9 个区域。
14 周后,EG 中优势腿的内侧和中央跖骨区域的最大压力降低(p=0.01 和 p=0.04),但 WG 中非优势腿的外侧足跟增加(p=0.03)。WG 中优势腿的内侧足跟(p=0.02)和非优势腿的外侧足跟(p=0.03)的平均最大压力也增加了。足底整体压力-时间积分在两组中均降低。WG 缩短了步幅时间(优势腿:p=0.01;非优势腿:p=0.01)和站立时间(优势腿:p<0.005;非优势腿:p<0.005)。两组的步行速度都没有变化。正如预期的那样,两种运动方案后下肢力量均得到改善(EG:p=0.02;WG:p=0.01)。
尽管这些训练干预时间很短,但它们表明运动类型的重要性。我们的结果表明,OA 可能受益于周期性训练,特别是在引入步行目标之前进行多组分训练方案。未来,应进行更大规模的研究,以探讨具有特定足部问题的特殊人群可能从这些干预中受益的情况。